applegetsmelaid, I sometimes wonder who the match is.
Cards on the table. Is 'Anonymous' a genuine, credible threat, or could it be a propaganda tool designed to influence corporate, political or public policy? The source remains largely unknown, so it could be anyone and for literally any reason. I don't know what the solution is to this but I think it's all too easy to easy to jump on the bandwagon and assume that Anonymous is some rogue hacking group looking for a thrill; for all we know it could be someone else merely pointing the finger in order to enforce their own agenda.