gm0n3y
Distinguished
[citation][nom]waethorn[/nom]Who is "they"? Anonymous is supposed to be autonomous. Anybody claiming to be from Anonymous can be.In any case, these fakers are just a bunch of douchebags, and they set a bad example. If you want to talk about fearmongering over copyright, how about this: these jokers advocate that everything should be public and no copyrights or intellectual property have any merit. Ok, so that means that cloud computing is out of the question since you can't post your vacation photos online with your kids because some asshole could just steal your login and sell it without your consent or whatever the hell they want because they don't see any problem with that (they have never seen any problem with stealing and publicly posting peoples logins and passwords and/or personal info before, including credit card info). Is this any better than SOPA? I'd argue that no, it isn't, since any beautiful being with a bit of hacking ability can steal your documents or whatever and use it either against you or for their own gain without any moral regard. This is the view of the Pirate Party in Sweden, just FYI. They see theft of any kind a victimless crime. Pictures of your kids: gone. Your doctorate thesis: so long. This is what they advocate. Sorry, but the world doesn't operate that way, and never should.[/citation]
I actually think that copying data should be legal, as long as you aren't profiting from it in any way. I say this as a musician and software developer. Its fine for the police to go after people / companies if they are making even a few dollars off of someone else's work.
I actually think that copying data should be legal, as long as you aren't profiting from it in any way. I say this as a musician and software developer. Its fine for the police to go after people / companies if they are making even a few dollars off of someone else's work.