[citation][nom]willard[/nom]Stalin gets an unfairly reductionist view of his reign. Yes, he did some truly heinous things that rival Hitler in their atrocity (Ukrainian genocide, anyone?). He caused one of the largest famines in history, killing more than a million people. He instated labor camps where people were literally worked to death, and executed more than twenty thousand peasants as part of a draconian crackdown on suspected farm theft.Stalin also brought the USSR back from the brink of collapse. He rebuilt a country that had been shattered in the war, restoring the economy from ~15% of pre-war production. He industrialized the country at an astonishing speed (largely thanks to the Gulag, one of his most despicable policies). Had Stalin not rebuilt Russia prior to WW2, Hitler may well have won the war on the Eastern Front quickly, as he had planned. Instead, Hitler suffered a costly defeat. Without Stalin, the Nazis may well have won the war.Stalin killed millions. Stalin saved millions and helped the Allies win WW2. I'm not saying he should be praised (by all means, continue condemning him). He's just not quite the abhorrent monster he's made out to be by most history textbooks. Stalin had the good of the people in mind, just not the good of individual people. Can't say that about Hitler.[/citation]
Stalin is nothing when comparing the number of people killed to Mr Mao in China, he manged to starved 40 million people to death. After all the mess he managed to create, approximately 100 million people were killed and he hardly had any contribution in WW2. Despite this, he is still the most respected figure in China.