I think this article isn't practical.
Factoring in practicalities-
Style -
The Pebble's screen is able to be always on - unlike the iWatch which would be out of charge after 3 hours if it's screen were on. Having a dead-looking black screen is decidedly even less stylish than even having a square smartwatch.
The iWatch also comes with a rubber strap - compared to the Time's (included) leather band, and the Time Steel's (included) metal band, and leather band, so you can choose. There's a whole range of swappable straps, and that's before we know what smartstraps will be available... AND that's still discounting that it uses standard 42mm watchbands, so you can maybe use a band you already own, if you like.
By contrast, the iWatch bands are proprietary (go figure), and the price is ludicrously prohibitive... the metal ones actually cost MORE than an entire Pebble Time - the leather ones are even $149! That's Looney Tunes crazy. Apple is banking on suckers.
Screen -
Sure, the Pebble isn't a touchscreen, and isn't as high-res... but:
a) is that necessary? Is it even a benefit? The Apple watch has that crown to do the same things as the Time's forward/back buttons - less efficiently.
b) it's also why the Pebble gets 7-10 days of battery life, with the screen displaying the entire time.
The benefit of the technology isn't being considered an advantage for Pebble - and the massive, power-sucking downside of Apple's technology isn't struck as a ding against the Apple watch, though it leaves it with 3-18 hour life on a charge.
To conclude that one watch [that's going to need to be black/off 99% of the time] is "better" than the one that can actually be on all the time, seems incorrect to me.
Apps-
With the list mentioned for Apple (and decidedly the lack of specific mentions for Pebble), it seems that Apple doesn't really know what this watch is supposed to be good for.
By contrast, there's 7000 apps for Pebble - no doubt a bunch of them are fluff or sort of questionable why you'd use those with a watch (like these Apple ones mentioned), but many of the Pebble ones are actually practical.
So I'm glad to see the author credit Pebble for apps, even if he didn't specifically mention the function-over-...whatever Apple is thinking it's doing in this segment.
And really, the ultimate practicality - bang for the buck.
If you want a Pebble Time Steel, $299 gets you a watch and two bands, plus any standard band you may already own or want to buy, and a robust and growing app store.
By contrast, if you want a leather and metal band with your iWatch, you have to buy the $599 version, and then add a $249 metal strap to it... $849!
At an all-in cost of $849 vs $299, there's just no comparison between these two. You could buy all three Pebble Time Steel watches and end up with three different color watches with six bands to swap between them.
Just no comparison - terrible value for the iWatch.
Practicality matters.
Factoring in practicalities-
Style -
The Pebble's screen is able to be always on - unlike the iWatch which would be out of charge after 3 hours if it's screen were on. Having a dead-looking black screen is decidedly even less stylish than even having a square smartwatch.
The iWatch also comes with a rubber strap - compared to the Time's (included) leather band, and the Time Steel's (included) metal band, and leather band, so you can choose. There's a whole range of swappable straps, and that's before we know what smartstraps will be available... AND that's still discounting that it uses standard 42mm watchbands, so you can maybe use a band you already own, if you like.
By contrast, the iWatch bands are proprietary (go figure), and the price is ludicrously prohibitive... the metal ones actually cost MORE than an entire Pebble Time - the leather ones are even $149! That's Looney Tunes crazy. Apple is banking on suckers.
Screen -
Sure, the Pebble isn't a touchscreen, and isn't as high-res... but:
a) is that necessary? Is it even a benefit? The Apple watch has that crown to do the same things as the Time's forward/back buttons - less efficiently.
b) it's also why the Pebble gets 7-10 days of battery life, with the screen displaying the entire time.
The benefit of the technology isn't being considered an advantage for Pebble - and the massive, power-sucking downside of Apple's technology isn't struck as a ding against the Apple watch, though it leaves it with 3-18 hour life on a charge.
To conclude that one watch [that's going to need to be black/off 99% of the time] is "better" than the one that can actually be on all the time, seems incorrect to me.
Apps-
With the list mentioned for Apple (and decidedly the lack of specific mentions for Pebble), it seems that Apple doesn't really know what this watch is supposed to be good for.
By contrast, there's 7000 apps for Pebble - no doubt a bunch of them are fluff or sort of questionable why you'd use those with a watch (like these Apple ones mentioned), but many of the Pebble ones are actually practical.
So I'm glad to see the author credit Pebble for apps, even if he didn't specifically mention the function-over-...whatever Apple is thinking it's doing in this segment.
And really, the ultimate practicality - bang for the buck.
If you want a Pebble Time Steel, $299 gets you a watch and two bands, plus any standard band you may already own or want to buy, and a robust and growing app store.
By contrast, if you want a leather and metal band with your iWatch, you have to buy the $599 version, and then add a $249 metal strap to it... $849!
At an all-in cost of $849 vs $299, there's just no comparison between these two. You could buy all three Pebble Time Steel watches and end up with three different color watches with six bands to swap between them.
Just no comparison - terrible value for the iWatch.
Practicality matters.