[citation][nom]Yoder54[/nom]You seem to be the confused one here. If you look at Apple and Microsoft, then you can see what the "open" business model got MS...they are slowly going extinct, while Apple continues to grow and innovate. There is something to be said for keeping a certain business model in place and restricting access to the core components. Once just anyone is allowed to go in and program/do what they want, then they end-up creating products that do not fall in line with the business model. Apple has hundreds of pages of text on just what a Mac interface should look like. Some may criticize this, but when you are selling to the general public you need to produce a product that provides the same look, works in a predictable manner, while at the same time is robust/stable.Calling Apple's attitude "fascist" indicates that you understand little about how a business works, and that you really do not know what the term means. To classify Apple users as "sheep" also just shows the world how ignorant you are of people, and how intolerant you are of those who happen to think differently and practice different consumer activities than you. You imply that Apple makes inferior products, yet today the street set their stock target price at $500. Furthermore, you probably have not seen 10 year old Apple labs still being used, while their Windows counterparts are breaking down after about 3-5 years of use.[/citation]
Fair enough, I can respect the idea that their business model restricts access to core components and software. I also know that this business model, and how strictly they enforce it, quickly evovles into search warrants of innocent people's homes, as well as a interrogation and suicide in their factories when a prototype goes missing; and not even a prototype of an iPhone, but something not many people have heard of.
I can also appreciate the idea of spending exhorbitant amounts of time and money into tailoring a product to appeal to the largest number of people possible, as in the case with the Mac interface.
I have a great deal of difficulty understanding how Apple's attitude couldn't be considered "fascist," especially since the fascism ideology is literally comprised of A) Strong leadership, B) Singular Collective identity, C) The will and ability to do what is needed to keep the central power strong (and fabricating situations where people committ suicide and having enough influence over the legal system to have someone's house broken into certainly fills this part).
As for referring to the average Apple user as a "sheep," I can't help but point to the fact that Apple price fixes their products, which is the prime reason why they have been so zealous (or should I say fascist?) in keeping Mac Clones out of the market. Apple releases a new version of the iMac/iBook/whatever, what, once every 2-3 years? And the actual hardware specifications never change in that time frame, however the cost doesn't change. Sure, computer purchases are always going to be based upon your needs at the time, but seriously most people who aren't die-hard apple fans can't justify the additional cost to buy only apple products when it's relatively simple to set things up in a non-apple environment.
Also, kudos on using Apple's actual tagline in your defense of it's users - Way to not be influenced by advertising.
So yeah, Apple has an amazing business model which generates them stupid amounts of profit because they have a stranglehold over a demographic which will throw money at them whenever they release a new product, regardless of said product's functionality/quality. Doesn't make them any less fascist, though, nor their lowest-common-denominator consumer any less of a sheep.