[citation][nom]demarest[/nom]Yep yep. The same applies to traffic stops for example. If a claim is positive, people react like "video or it didn't happen." If a claim is negative, people react like "why would somebody make that up?" That dichotomy is pure hypocrisy and indicative of people's NEED for drama.[/citation]
and police actively fight having cameras on them 24/7
when video evidence shows the cop is wrong, or it happened another way, they deny it, and courts still find it hard to not take their word.
and lets also point out "wire tapping" laws which see that people who do get this evidence can be put in prison because of archaic both have to consent to being on tape laws (only applys to audio)
i got legitimate fears, and being able to take 24/7 would get rid of most of them, but than you have laws that say if you show the evidence you will be screwed, or worse yet, if it is a cop that screwed you and you got evidence on, for some reason they are tight nit, and even if the cop was way in the wrong, have fun with every cop being on you for the preciveable future.