Are Google's Fancy Glasses Perfect for the Porn Industry?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ojas

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2011
370
0
18,940
Of course, this may be a rather professional use of Google's technology and rather awkward in a natural relationship.
Duh? What kind of creep would use it in a natural relationship?
 

alidan

Distinguished
Aug 5, 2009
1,681
0
19,730
[citation][nom]sicmofo[/nom]a smart date would be not go out with anyone wearing these to a date. what a creeper.[/citation]

lol, i refuse to do anything with anyone with out video evidance, seeing as i am a man, and the court system is currently "the woman said it, must be true"

look at slut walk pictures where they have the women who hold the signs that say "my rapist doest know he is a rapist" scares the hell out of me being a guy and doing anything with a woman without documented video evidence.
 

eiskrystal

Distinguished
May 11, 2007
89
0
18,580
The chance of a woman being raped/attacked in her lifetime is about 1 in 6, the chance of a man on a date being convicted of rape.. not even worth the time writing all the zeros....

....Unless you're some weirdo that records all his encounters with women....

LOL get some perspective.

 

tom85

Honorable
Feb 12, 2012
3
0
10,510
[citation][nom]eiskrystal[/nom]The chance of a woman being raped/attacked in her lifetime is about 1 in 6, the chance of a man on a date being convicted of rape.. not even worth the time writing all the zeros........Unless you're some weirdo that records all his encounters with women....LOL get some perspective.[/citation]

Did you just compare odds of lifetime vs. 1 date? try again
 

alidan

Distinguished
Aug 5, 2009
1,681
0
19,730
[citation][nom]demarest[/nom]Yep yep. The same applies to traffic stops for example. If a claim is positive, people react like "video or it didn't happen." If a claim is negative, people react like "why would somebody make that up?" That dichotomy is pure hypocrisy and indicative of people's NEED for drama.[/citation]
and police actively fight having cameras on them 24/7
when video evidence shows the cop is wrong, or it happened another way, they deny it, and courts still find it hard to not take their word.
and lets also point out "wire tapping" laws which see that people who do get this evidence can be put in prison because of archaic both have to consent to being on tape laws (only applys to audio)

i got legitimate fears, and being able to take 24/7 would get rid of most of them, but than you have laws that say if you show the evidence you will be screwed, or worse yet, if it is a cop that screwed you and you got evidence on, for some reason they are tight nit, and even if the cop was way in the wrong, have fun with every cop being on you for the preciveable future.
 

gm0n3y

Distinguished
Mar 13, 2006
1,548
0
19,730
The problem with this is that way more people are likely to borrow your phone and browse around on it then on your home computer. How are phones/glasses more private than a computer in your own home?

That being said, if they make a 3D version of Google glasses with POV porn, I'm totally down for that. Or in a non-pornographic context, add a gyro and these could be used as a cool gaming headset. Of course that tech has been around for a long time now.
 

freggo

Distinguished
Nov 22, 2008
778
0
18,930
"smart dating" ?

I'd call it creepy dating !

If you personality and knowledge comes from a search engine you are not really worth much.
 

leakingpaint

Distinguished
Jul 2, 2007
65
0
18,580
haha! Instead of "Air Guitar" listening to your iPod it'd be "Air Groping" watching your Google Glass...just don't do it in public...that awkward moment when someone catches me jamming an imaginary guitar is embarrassing enough
 
Status
Not open for further replies.