[citation][nom]theargiope[/nom]Telecoms want to manipulate people into thinking that bandwidth is some kind of precious resource. In reality, it's a commodity. The bandwidth speed on my iPhone 4 - in the Atlanta suburbs and about 500 feet from the nearest tower - averages about 1.35Mbps down, and 1.20Mbps up. That's approximately 0.000165 GB per second. Thus, accruing 1GB of bandwidth is a little over 6,000 seconds of transfer at that average speed. 4GB would be 24,000 seconds of transfer. That's about 800 seconds per day over the course of a 30 day month. Of course, at over 1Mbps speeds, it doesn't take very long to do just about anything a normal person would do on a pocket device. What percentage of iPhone users do you think actually burn more than 800 seconds of transfer every single day? If you said less than 10%, you would be correct. There are absolutely power users can could burn 10GB/mo or more in a month. But we're talking about a tiny percentage of users that are far beyond offset by the other 90% -- most of which don't come close to even 1GB/mo.My point is -- "Unlimited Data" would be little more than just really good marketing. It would give AT&T brand value benefits, and a superficial benefit over Verizon. But why build brand value when you can make people think bandwidth is rare, and thus expensive?Greed is good, right? It's why our economy is always so stable and secure, after all.[/citation]
You shouldve converted 800 seconds into minutes to see just how little transfer that is.
800 seconds = a little more than 13 minutes. The full 4GB is about 7 hours. Considering the number of people that watch more than 13 minutes of youtube each day, thats not very much bandwidth. Also, people will continue to use even more bandwidth on their phones as they are able to watch netflix on them soon (and may even hook their phones up to their tv to watch netflix).