Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Nostrobino" <not@home.today> wrote in message
news:HqqdnQMTUM99y2zfRVn-qg@comcast.com...
>
> "Proteus" <nospam@nowhere.net> wrote in message
> news:rBaIe.3838$Tt6.925@fe04.lga...
>> Nostrobino wrote:
>> ...
>>> Did your *credit card company* tell you that, or did you hear it from
>>> someone in a bar? It seems extremely unlikely to me. Sounds like
>>> bullshit,
>>> in fact. Did you call you credit card company when you "saw [you were]
>>> being shafted" in that way?
>>>
>> ..
>>
>> Credit card company. I called and talked to credit card customer service
>> about that.
>
> Well, that's interesting. I just called my credit card company to ask for
> their policy in such a situation, but they are now apparently outsourcing
> their customer service to India (as so many other companies are), with the
> result that I spoke to a woman whose English I could barely understand.
> But what she *seemed* to be saying was that in such a situation (i.e.,
> seller tries to refuse cancellation of an order even though out of stock)
> I could call the c.c. company and they would straighten it out with the
> seller. She definitely did say I would *not* be "held hostage" on the
> order as you stated in your post.
>
> I suppose different c.c. companies have different policies.
>
> Now I'm sure that if a seller *clearly states* in his ad that the order
> cannot be cancelled (e.g., for a special-order item) that would be
> different, obviously. But if the item is represented as being in stock and
> really isn't, I cannot imagine any reputable credit card company letting
> the seller hold the customer hostage in that way.
>
> N.
>
Different companies have very different policies...found that out in two
instances involving
recurring charges to a charge card. The first involved canceling an ISP
(and calling them and
recanceling a number of times) who insisted on continuing to charge my
credit card (Citibank,
fortunately). I explained the situation to Citibank and that the ISP was
not authorized by me to
charge my account any longer and Citibank no longer accepted any charges
from them. I had an
identical situation occur a few years later with a different company and a
different credit card
issuer and was told by the credit card company that I'd have to get the
rogue company to quit
stealing from my account of their own volition. I no longer deal with that
credit card company
and NEVER will again. I also never allow any recurring charges under any
conditions as they
are MUCH more difficult to EVER get rid of and you never really know what
you cc company's
policy on such things will be at the time you have a problem.
"Nostrobino" <not@home.today> wrote in message
news:HqqdnQMTUM99y2zfRVn-qg@comcast.com...
>
> "Proteus" <nospam@nowhere.net> wrote in message
> news:rBaIe.3838$Tt6.925@fe04.lga...
>> Nostrobino wrote:
>> ...
>>> Did your *credit card company* tell you that, or did you hear it from
>>> someone in a bar? It seems extremely unlikely to me. Sounds like
>>> bullshit,
>>> in fact. Did you call you credit card company when you "saw [you were]
>>> being shafted" in that way?
>>>
>> ..
>>
>> Credit card company. I called and talked to credit card customer service
>> about that.
>
> Well, that's interesting. I just called my credit card company to ask for
> their policy in such a situation, but they are now apparently outsourcing
> their customer service to India (as so many other companies are), with the
> result that I spoke to a woman whose English I could barely understand.
> But what she *seemed* to be saying was that in such a situation (i.e.,
> seller tries to refuse cancellation of an order even though out of stock)
> I could call the c.c. company and they would straighten it out with the
> seller. She definitely did say I would *not* be "held hostage" on the
> order as you stated in your post.
>
> I suppose different c.c. companies have different policies.
>
> Now I'm sure that if a seller *clearly states* in his ad that the order
> cannot be cancelled (e.g., for a special-order item) that would be
> different, obviously. But if the item is represented as being in stock and
> really isn't, I cannot imagine any reputable credit card company letting
> the seller hold the customer hostage in that way.
>
> N.
>
Different companies have very different policies...found that out in two
instances involving
recurring charges to a charge card. The first involved canceling an ISP
(and calling them and
recanceling a number of times) who insisted on continuing to charge my
credit card (Citibank,
fortunately). I explained the situation to Citibank and that the ISP was
not authorized by me to
charge my account any longer and Citibank no longer accepted any charges
from them. I had an
identical situation occur a few years later with a different company and a
different credit card
issuer and was told by the credit card company that I'd have to get the
rogue company to quit
stealing from my account of their own volition. I no longer deal with that
credit card company
and NEVER will again. I also never allow any recurring charges under any
conditions as they
are MUCH more difficult to EVER get rid of and you never really know what
you cc company's
policy on such things will be at the time you have a problem.