I just came here to look for recommendations for home Wi-Fi routers given the absolute FLOOD of press that TP-Link has gotten recently about the horrific security problems that their products have. This article was updated to "Best Wi-Fi 7 routers of 2024: The future of Wi-Fi is here" and the update is from November 2024, just a few weeks ago. If I can't put some other software on it, then it's getting the hammer if it's not too late to return it.
So imagine my disgust when I find that three out of top six (half!) of the recommended routers are TP-Link? No, really -- try to imagine it. Apparently what isn't mentioned in these reviews is that TP-Link's high bandwidth is a reference to the rate of CVEs that they generate, rather than their data transfer abilities.
Given that this article was just updated weeks ago, how is it not mentioned (or found) that these things are such sh!t that they're considering banning them, and that you're STILL recommending them? While it MAY be the case that there's less known about the newest routers, their history SHOULD make them suspect, and at the least, should get a (dis)honorable mention in product reviews.
You owe it to your readers to either address this directly or to just pull this whole (sponsored?) article immediately.
To learn more:
View: https
/www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCdZaSu68Kk
.