[citation][nom]annoyed one[/nom]Come on people... 3 people complaining about what they claim is an incorrect sensor size due to one other magazine article. All the additional research I am finding shows that the dpreview article is incorrect with their size.Articles at:http
/www.gizmag.com/canon-120-me [...] sor/16128/andhttp
/www.wired.com/gadgetlab/201 [...] el-sensor/both support Tom's reported size. Even the photographs indicate it is rectangular, not square like the dpreview measurement would be.Finally, use some common sense on the measurement. How big is 200 mm in an understandable measurement? It's about 10 inches square, so about the size of a piece of notebook paper! Everything I read points to an error in dpreview, not Tom's.[/citation]
The 202x205mm sensor is a different topic altogether. It's not an article error in dpreview. There really is a 202x205mm sensor developed by canon. There's even a picture of it in the article. Now, imagine how big the body and lens have to be to use that huge sensor