Internet usage caps seem to be unfortunately becoming more common. Earlier this week, Charter confirmed to Broadband Reports that they would be introducing new usage caps on their broadband Internet plans.
I wonder why the cap on all of the older and cheaper plans and not the new 60mbps? Could it be they want us to buy the new more expensive plan, just so we can be capped again? I'm a Charter customer if they cap me I will lower my Internet package. Plain and simple why should I pay for a service I can't use. All of the idiots that don't will be stupid to give into them.
I was afraid something like this was going to happen. Ultimately I think it comes down to profiteering. I doubt they will EVER lower the cost to people that use little bandwidth, yet, I find it likely that they will impose higher and higher rates on those that use high rates. With streaming HD video services like netflix popping up you could reach that 100GB limit faster than you think. I would estimate that my monthly rate is somewhere closer to 300GB. And that's just download. I have an always on torrent client server.
I wish in here we would have such big usage caps (Europe, Portugal) o_o
We don't have connections faster than 30 Mbps. Even though some ISPs already have unlimited traffic, many have caps like 20GB limit on downloads + uploads for a 10Mbps connection or 40GB limit on a 20Mbps connection (both have something called "happy hours", with unlimited traffic between certain times during the night, for example between 1am and 9am).
The cap really don't make all the difference, I think there are very few people downloading over 1,2TB/year.
The only issue might be if I'd have a very busy month, and need to download 150GB, I'd have to spread it over 2 months.
In Belgium ISP's are just plain stupid!
There's a 15GB limit,which is way too little even for the average internet fan. In order to download your material you need to download the first 10-15GB on highband. Then they set you on lowband.
You basically will be using internet 24/7 on lowband to get an additional 30Gb downloaded per month; or, pay eur. 27 per month extra (which is outrageously much for many).
Imagine you're running a business and you just capped 100GB,you all of a sudden can't receive any mails anymore?
I hope the ISP will understand this and not cut but lower internet bandwidth instead to say dual ISDN speeds (112kbs up/dn)
On high times (and I view a lot of streaming TV) I use upto about 45-50GB download a month, that translates in viewing TV every evening after work for about 2-3 hours.
On low months I'm not using more than 2GB.
For the end user 100GB should be enough, and whatever is getting close to the limit can always be downloaded a next month.
Though I agree that I wouldn't want ISP's to make abuse of it, and keep on lowering the monthly limit.
I hope they at least implement a meter of some sort that tells your how much you have left...
Mainstream wireless protection is a joke and is far too easy to hack into. What if someone goes over their limit by a few hundred gigabytes because their neighbor found it more convenient to use someone elses internet?
[citation][nom]ProDigit80[/nom]The cap really don't make all the difference, I think there are very few people downloading over 1,2TB/year.[/citation]
Sure, very few people download 1.2TB of content to their hard drive each year. But in a day and age when even YouTube has HD content, it's easy to hit that limit. If you like to stream Movies from Netflix, or with all the Networks offering streaming of some of their episodes, TV shows, or playing games online, VOIP, all of these things are bandwidth intensive.