When I look at the cell phone reviews and the costs I don't see how the cost of ownership factors in how long a vendor supplies security updates for it phones. If a vendor only supplies 2 years of updates - for example Motorola (after first product ship) and another vendor provides 3 years - e.g, Google Pixel and Apple provides 4-5+ years, isn't that an important factor in considering the useful life of a mobile phone investment? It seems that the cost of ownership per year would be pretty different after factoring in this "feature."
Am I putting too much emphasis of getting the monthly OS security updates?
What am I missing?
Am I putting too much emphasis of getting the monthly OS security updates?
What am I missing?