Digital Picture Frame Vs. Photo Album

Status
Not open for further replies.

bri-guy

Distinguished
Mar 23, 2010
11
0
18,560
0
I've seen the Philips 7ff1cmi, which has a rechargeable battery but I don't think that it lasts for than a few hours.

BN
 

JohnnyLucky

Distinguished
May 30, 2007
990
0
18,930
0
Girlfriend received a digital photo frame from her daughter last year. It was pre-loaded with photos of the grandchildren. First few days there was an initial wow factor. After that it just sat there turned off. I don't think my girlfriend has turned it on for an entire year.
 

bri-guy

Distinguished
Mar 23, 2010
11
0
18,560
0
I can see that happening. I've had a frame running behind my desk for about a month, cycling through my photos and I kind of like glancing over to it every once in a while. I've been startled by some of the pictures that I haven't seen in decades. It's a nice time machine.
bn
 

tomate2

Distinguished
Apr 8, 2010
45
0
18,590
3
since you mentioned about not taking into account all the environmental impacts of making a photo album i guess who should talk about the environmental impacts of making a digital frame?? like the part of it being made by cheap labor outside of the us... the man work to keep digging up all those materials to START making a digital frame... or the bit extra electricity your using on the digital frame which comes from burning fossil fuels or flooding huge regions to build a dam... i guess you get the idea.. :D
 

bri-guy

Distinguished
Mar 23, 2010
11
0
18,560
0
Not justt that, but all the oil and natural gas that goes into the plastics, glass and silicon. Then, there's what to do with it after its ten (hopefully more) year life span is over and it's time to chuck it. There are times I wish I were an economist to untangle these questions. While researching the story I asked several experts in photography, including those who specialize in green photography, and none could even start to answer the question.

BN
 

wtlloyd

Distinguished
Apr 22, 2010
1
0
18,510
0
Just in terms of volume of materials used, it's clear, to me at least, that if every household had an 8x10 digital photo frame, vrs every household owning a dedicated photo printer along with attendant ink cartridges, boxes of inkjet paper...the waste stream is continuous with a photo printer.
The digital photo frame is clearly the way photo display is moving. Excitement over the IPad in Fine Art photography circles is over it's use as a portfolio. Recent industry pundit articles (Thomas Hogan) discussing "whither cameras" argue that the next development required to restart sales (the market is reaching saturation, and digicams are about to be made obsolete with improved camera phones) will be the communication (digital) between the photo making device and the storage and display devices.
Finally, referring to professionally printed photos vrs digital photo frames is a false argument...Fine art printing, with color balancing, tonal corrections, localized adjustments, and color managed output, is hardly typical of what you get when you send your snapshots off to Costco or wherever...Better pictures result from becoming a better photographer, not whether output is displayed on paper or screen.
 

DianeJones

Distinguished
Jan 28, 2009
1
0
18,510
0
I prefer a scapbook. A traditional photo album just doesn't have the same "wow" factor as flipping through pages of photos and memorabilia attractively displayed in a scapbook. I find that sitting a watching a digital photo frame for 15-30 minutes is very tedious.

I am currently making a scrapbook for my son's graduation and have decided that when I finish that I will move on to doing other family albums so that I may enjoy the pictures instead of just packing them away in boxes. I do like the idea of a digital photo frame for a desk at work: I may check into that.

You can get 4x6 prints of digital photos from CVS for 19 cents each. I upload them from my computer and pick them up in the store.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Another option is to put your photos in a photo book, a service offered online by many companies. They produce a hardback coffee table book with up to 84 pages holding up to 4 photos per page on photo paper.

This uses no electricity and can be passed around for viewing unlike a digital frame. A portable DVD plater which is battery powered will usually display jpeg photos form a card or CD.
 

joneb

Distinguished
Jan 15, 2007
23
0
18,560
0
Erm theres somethig wrong in this article. if a digital photoframe was used like a photoalbum it wouldnt be on all the time but only when used. If the proper comparison was made what then would be the difference. I agree for photos displayed constantly prints seem definitely more environmentally friendly. But then if you have a laptop or a netbook you dont need the photoframe do you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
green4172 Digital Cameras 0
R Digital Cameras 3
D Digital Cameras 1
E Digital Cameras 5
A Digital Cameras 1
N Digital Cameras 4
P Digital Cameras 3
S Digital Cameras 2
T Digital Cameras 2
R Digital Cameras 3
K Digital Cameras 1
G Digital Cameras 1
R Digital Cameras 3
T Digital Cameras 2
V Digital Cameras 2
M Digital Cameras 3
K Digital Cameras 1
N Digital Cameras 1
G Digital Cameras 4
G Digital Cameras 2

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS