Dimmers

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Ty Ford"

> Is it just me or does anyone else noticed how much nicer rap is after
having
> killfiled the philbot.



** Only scum want to eliminate their critics.

Typhoid has all the qualifications.




............. Phil

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Phil Allison wrote:

> ** Only scum want to eliminate their critics.

So that's everyone here judging by your usual comments ( assume including
liars, parrots et al ).


Graham

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:53:19 +1200, Patrick Dunford
<patrickdunford@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> Every sound system manual I have ever seen recommends strongly you have
> dimmers on a separate phase from the sound system.
>
> The problem with this is, most dimmer packs are three phase.
>
> Short of not using 1/3 of your channels, what can be done about the noise
> problems?

The manuals are talking about studio installs, whereas dimmer packs are
"luggable" in that context.

When I was doing theatre, they'd bring in 200+ channels of dimmers.
These would be wired direct very close to the service entrance with the
ground lead doubled, making a very robust earth connection.

The sound equipment would then be effectively "separate" . . a much
smaller load usually a service panel or two removed from the lighting.

The "dimmer problem" is most often encountered in a residential or
commercial space that's retrofitted into a studio. Residential dimmers
have to meet emmission standards sufficient for TV viewing, but they
don't stand up to critical listening.

If the power distribution is well-planned and the dimmers are of better
quality (variacs, hopefully), this is less of a problem.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Pooh Bear"
>
> Phil Allison wrote:
>
> > ** Only scum want to eliminate their critics.
>
> So that's everyone here ...



** Only the lowest usenet vermin use the killfile on someone and THEN go on
posting abuse of that person.





............ Phil

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Pooh Bear wrote:

> Phil Assilon wrote:

> > ** Only scum want to eliminate their critics.

> So that's everyone here judging by your usual comments ( assume including
> liars, parrots et al ).

What he meant to say is that civilized people flush the toilet.

--
ha

 

[fuel]

Archived from groups: nz.tech,rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:14:25 +0200, Joakim Wendel
<oviktig@bostreammail.net> scribbled:


>
>
>No wonder you guys go bomb other countries off the planet ... sheesh
> wait, where is nz?

Funny. Har har. You should be a stand-up comedian.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"U-CDK_CHARLES
Patrick Dunford

> > Every sound system manual I have ever seen recommends strongly you have
> > dimmers on a separate phase from the sound system.
> >
> > The problem with this is, most dimmer packs are three phase.
> >
> > Short of not using 1/3 of your channels, what can be done about the
noise
> > problems?
>
> The manuals are talking about studio installs, whereas dimmer packs are
> "luggable" in that context.


** The manuals are talking about sound systems - not studios of any kind.


> When I was doing theatre, they'd bring in 200+ channels of dimmers.
> These would be wired direct very close to the service entrance with the
> ground lead doubled, making a very robust earth connection.
>
> The sound equipment would then be effectively "separate" . . a much
> smaller load usually a service panel or two removed from the lighting.
>

** AS recommended in the manuals Patrick is reading.


> The "dimmer problem" is most often encountered in a residential or
> commercial space that's retrofitted into a studio.


** Is anyone so dumb they have triac dimmed lights installed in a
recording studio ????


> Residential dimmers have to meet emmission standards sufficient for TV
viewing,


** AM and short wave bands are covered too - just not the AUDIO band !!



> If the power distribution is well-planned and the dimmers are of better
> quality (variacs, hopefully), this is less of a problem.
>


** Variac and variable inductance dimming went out decades ago.

For critical applications, where no audible buzz can be accepted there are
modern "Sine Wave" dimmers - using either mosfets ot IGBTs to "chop" the AC
at supersonic high frequency and scale it to any desired value.


http/www.stld.org.uk/php/index.php?sectionid=19&parentid=4&contentid=176




.............. Phil

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"mr c deckard"
>
> phil, why are you still here? you gain nothing (no one here is as
> knowledgeable as you), and you give nothing.


** Hey, to that Dickhard shithead !!


In the space below explain what you think a public forum is ???

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---






----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


** In this next space explain why you think anyone is entitled to act like
they own this NG ??


---------------------------------------------------------------------------





----------------------------------------------------------------------------



** I wait with interest.



.............. Phil

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Phil Allison" <philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:<2rrr2cF1e1ga8U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> "mr c deckard"
> >
> > phil, why are you still here? you gain nothing (no one here is as
> > knowledgeable as you), and you give nothing.
>
>
> ** Hey, to that Dickhard shithead !!
>
>
> In the space below explain what you think a public forum is ???
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> ** In this next space explain why you think anyone is entitled to act like
> they own this NG ??
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ** I wait with interest.
>
>
>
> ............. Phil

You didn't answer his question ("phil, why are you still here? you
gain nothing (no one here is as knowledgeable as you), and you give
nothing"), you only changed the subject. Why not answer his question?
It should be easy for a genius like you, Phil.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Phil Allison" <philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:<2rrr2cF1e1ga8U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> "mr c deckard"





phil, if you *really* wait for my answers with "interest", then you
must first answer the question i asked you *first* (note that i'm not
telling you to leave, i'm trying to find out why you stay when
everyone really, really wants you to):

-----------
phil, why are you still here? you gain nothing (no one here is as
knowledgeable as you), and you give nothing.

absolutely NO ONE wants you here. everyone here is in a group
throwing rocks at you, yelling at you to GO AWAY. it's rather
pathetic, and i'm kinda getting embarrassed for you.
------------


if you honestly answer that question (it actually is quite an honest
question), i will honestly answer the two that you included below.




it just boggles my mind, phil, that someone would stick around and
bother in a forum (of idiots, parrots, and, as we've come to find out,
problematic names) where they are *actively NOT wanted*, and they
contribute and gain NOTHING.

in a way, phil, it challenges my model of behaviourial theory, so i'm
trying to figure out if i need to update it or not.


your friend,
chris "dickhard" deckard
saint louis mo








> In the space below explain what you think a public forum is ???
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> ** In this next space explain why you think anyone is entitled to act like
> they own this NG ??
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ** I wait with interest.
>
>
>
> ............. Phil

 

[David]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <f290bcd4.0409280641.7a2bda8a@posting.google.com>,
ThePaulThomas <thepaulthomas@hotmail.com> wrote:

> The question and comment you have not answered was quoted in my
> original post. I will repeat it again:
>
> "phil, why are you still here? you gain nothing (no one here is as
> knowledgeable as you), and you give nothing".
>
> So let's hear your answer to the question, Phil. Why are you still
> here?




Like the Triumph, the insult comic dog on Conan O'Brien, his job is to
poop on you.





David Correia
Celebration Sound
Warren, Rhode Island

CelebrationSound@aol.com
www.CelebrationSound.com

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Ty Ford"

> I never take advice from anonymous doctors.
>
> Ty Ford


** ROTFLMAO !!!

A prize charlatan will not take advice from someone he suspect might be
just like him !!!





............ Phil

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Phil Allison" <philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:<2rsrnhF1duaapU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> "Ty Ford"
>
> > I never take advice from anonymous doctors.
> >
> > Ty Ford

Heh, thanks for the morning laugh. I feel the same way about advice from
random recordists.

> ** ROTFLMAO !!!
>
> A prize charlatan will not take advice from someone he suspect might be
> just like him !!!
>
> ........... Phil

"... just like him"? I'm a lot younger than Ty, and better looking. He has a nicer
mic collection, though.

-DrBoom

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Phil Allison" <philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:2rsrnhF1duaapU1@uni-berlin.de...

>
> *************************
> *************************
> ........... Phil
>

I'm wondering what kind of person feels so powerless in their own life that
they turn to a place like usenet for some measure of power. You differ from
'normal' trolls in that you appear to be a real person and you only use one
address to post from. So your motivation isn't to destroy the group, as some
kids get their jollies doing over in alt. You seem to try and help some of
the newer members of the forum while attempting, as best as you can, to
insult the 'die-hards'. This is a classic usenet 'divide and conquer'
strategy, but unsuccessful for you as your posting style is uncharismatic in
all ways.

I'm really interested in usenet culture, and I'm writing a dissertation, so
I have a few questions.

1) Are you married? Have you ever been married?
2) What do you do for a living? What is your job title?
3) How much money do you make?
4) Do you come from a single parent household?
5) Do you have fond memories of childhood?
6) Are you affiliated with a political party? If so, what?
7) Are you affiliatd with a religious group, if so, which?
8) Have you ever wounded an animal? If so, why?
9) Do you watch TV? What are your favorite shows?
10) How much sugar do you consume in a day? Caffeine? Alcohol? Canabis?
Cocaine? Heroin?
11) Have you ever been incarcerated? If so, why?
12) Are you now or have you ever been a member of the communist party?
13) Which testacle hangs lower, the right or the left?

Thanks Phil, I know you're the helpful type so I'll just thank you in
advance for your speedy answering.

jb

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:51:31 -0400, DrBoom wrote
(in article <69adb0eb.0409280651.13d9dfa0@posting.google.com>):

> "Phil Allison" <philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
> news:<2rsrnhF1duaapU1@uni-berlin.de>...
>> "Ty Ford"
>>
>>> I never take advice from anonymous doctors.
>>>
>>> Ty Ford
>
> Heh, thanks for the morning laugh. I feel the same way about advice from
> random recordists.

Me too.

I'm a lot younger than Ty, and better looking. He has a
> nicer
> mic collection, though.
>
> -DrBoom

Chicks dig it.

Ty Ford



-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Phil Allison wrote:

> "mr c dickard"
>
>
>>phil, if you *really* wait for my answers with "interest", then you
>>must first answer the question i asked you *first*
>
>
>
> ** I have.
>
> " Anyone is entitled to contribute to a PUBLIC FORUM. "

You can, so you will for no other reason. Do I have that
right?

You must be a _very_ busy troll.

Entitled or not, you are not wanted by anyone here.
Probably never have been anywhere.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

>> " Anyone is entitled to contribute to a PUBLIC FORUM. "

>Entitled or not, you are not wanted by anyone here.
>Probably never have been anywhere.

How late must one stay up to consider *both* of these positions
to have equivalent or at least comparable validity? I could
answer the question if I only knew my current time zone.

Bon chance, mon ami's,

Chris Hornbeck

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"reddred"


** Mr R Dred, your last frontal lobotomy was not successful - have
another.




............ Phil

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Bob Cain"
> Phil Allison wrote:
>
> > "mr c dickard"

> >>phil, if you *really* wait for my answers with "interest", then you
> >>must first answer the question i asked you *first*
> >
> >
> > ** I have.
> >
> > " Anyone is entitled to contribute to a PUBLIC FORUM. "
>
>
> You can, so you will for no other reason. Do I have that
> right?


** Not even slightly.

But The Porcine Prince of Fools never gets anything right.


>
> Entitled or not, you are not wanted by anyone here.
>


** Certainly not wanted buy all the charlatans, spivs and their dupes.

I see you are their self appointed advocate.





.............. Phil

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

> >
> > Entitled or not, you are not wanted by anyone here.
> >
>
>
> ** Certainly not wanted buy all the charlatans, spivs and their dupes.
>
> I see you are their self appointed advocate.
>


well, it seems that this whole list is comprised of charlatans, spivs,
and their dupes. not to mention idiots, parrots and one, i'm proud to
say, "dickhard"!

so why do you stay, phil? do you LIKE hanging around charlatans,
spivs and their dupes? idiots, parrots and dickhards?

on top of that, they don't even want you around!

phil, i suggest that the reason you don't directly answer my question
("phil, why do you stay here when no one wants you here"), is that
you're ashamed of the answer. which is ok, shame is an important
human emotion.

this is why i suggest that you dismiss this whole list as charlatans,
spivs, and their dupes, parrots, idiots, dickhards, etc., and announce
that you're too good for the likes of us, and be off! you insult us,
AND you save face!

your friend,
chris "dickhard" deckard
saint louis mo