[citation][nom]NatureTM[/nom]lol ericburnby, you're really riled up! mcrissjr only said Android is more open. I don't know how anyone could deny that fact[/citation]
Er, it seems you're really riled up to me. Ericburnby only said that there are things iOS can do better. I don't know how anyone could deny that fact. The point, in case you missed it - is that being 'open' and being able to read the source code? Is pointless. It doesn't help you build better apps, it doesn't mean anything. From a developers point of view, I agree it's far easier to develop on iOS. That's *much* more important than it being open.
'I'm up for it, are you?" makes you sound like a real know-it-all'
It only makes him sound like that to people with inferiority complexes. To me, it makes him look like he actually has a clue what is relevant, and important when it comes to building apps, and he isn't clinging on the notion of 'open source' like it's the holy grail where no bad can happen.
'A wise person realizes, no matter how smart they think they are, there are a *ton* of people who know more than them.'
In your case, that appears to be true. For others, who have vastly more experience than you (the *ton* of people you refer to), they can have confidence in their opinions because they actually recognise what is important. It would be unwise for such a person to attach any credence to a guy who essentially says 'you're riled up and open source is good'. And yes, I utilised your lame blueprint to demonstrate how pathetic it is.