If I'm reading it right, the source code back then helped put Facebook on the map and get used on the Internet and start the word spreading...no source code, no Facebook v1, no actual users who tell others about it...to grow it to what it is today. Zuckerberg needed both the idea and its implementation (source code) to get his idea off the ground and make him and Facebook to what it is today, warts and all.
Technically though, I agree Facebook isn't all that...you add text and upload photos for all to see (even if you don't want everyone to see it?
)...big whoop...that's pretty much all Facebook does. The real success is cultural, which seems less related to techbnology than PR, "buzz", and marketing, coupled with an a recent cultural irrational need for us to let the world know what we're doing (which I don't generally agree with, I never want to be "that important" and I feel much of the stuff on FB I see either isn't anyone's business or we have no business knowing about) and in making FB scale so it can handle the number of people using it. Think about it, if FB has 100 people using it total, even with the same technical "capability" it has today, nobody would care. XXX millions of users, now people care.
I for one sure wouldn't want the FB team designing our Space Shuttle! 3-2-1---liftoff---oh, we "had a staff meeting" and decided on our own to change the shuttle to include tons of Mountain Dew on board, and we didn't feel we needed to mention the changes we made. Why didn't it leave the launch pad?
As for the $64M vs $32M settlement, I see both points, it's a lot of money...However, it may not be as much as you'd think... $32M divided by 3 people = $10.6M each...assume 50% in attorney fees, now it's $5.3M each. Take off 30% for taxes, this leaves $3.7M net per "former Zuckerberg friend". My swags in attorney fees and taxes certainly could be off, and $3.7M is still a lot of money to me. But if I felt my "former friend Zuckerberg" scre*ed me over the years by stealing my idea and implementation, and then added insult to injury by deliberately misleading me about the settlement by 50% and that I had a legitimate case, why not fight the good fight, especially with the $3.7M in our three respective pockets?