Facebook Introduces Photo Tagging Approval Process

Status
Not open for further replies.

fancarolina

Distinguished
Jan 3, 2009
58
0
18,590
1
"The company this introduced a new feature that allows you to vet the photos friends are tagging you in."

What the hell learn to proofread. I hope you don't get paid to write.
 

AbdullahG

Distinguished
Jun 17, 2011
138
0
18,640
3
[citation][nom]Fancarolina[/nom]"The company this introduced a new feature that allows you to vet the photos friends are tagging you in."What the hell learn to proofread. I hope you don't get paid to write.[/citation]

"What the hell! Learn to proofread. I hope you don't get paid to write."

Edited just for you.
 
G

Guest

Guest
I must be the only one who remembers that this "new" phototagging feature was how facebook handled phototagging when it was first introduced >_>
 

SmileyTPB1

Distinguished
Jul 26, 2006
86
0
18,580
0
If Facebook knew so much about me they would already know that these people aren't my "Friends" and wouldn't allow any photo tagging.
 

K-zon

Distinguished
Apr 17, 2010
179
0
18,630
0
Why not just say anyone who is a memeber of facebook gets the likeness "copyrighted" and only able to be posted if approved?

Probably cuase confusing and complicated issues for awhile, but for the sack of them though would be in lack of others sometimes.

Eventually a point of interest of use will be useless for it though, despite many arguements. But of them though are that of those at least. If not debates within itself though too.

Otherwise to say its a social site, and what else to have on it though but those of your say friends and family. If there was going to be problems with say such ideas, then being left to your own would be another story to say or interest of the like.

Given issues aside is place within what interests are probably not of any, which is probbaly hard founf for what they are. So otherwise issues not aside are probably better placed, and at least the option to work with something takes its place.

Not every photo is the greatest but the greatest sometimes aren;t worth posting either, but that is always deabtable. But of ideas of arguements and debates there is at least a start of some sense with it for some reasonablilty. Otherwise just not wanting to post say images at times is anyones guess.

(Might read towards the end first of this half-way placed paragraph)
Might as well say no to haven't thought or felt that way sometimes and go from there. But again though probably not and say no photos and/or images and go from there. For ideas of take on whats first is probably better left to whats read but changing it does place ideas of what is placed for thoughts of any. Again though is say additional thoughtless places of happening could make there place of say debate or arguement the most, then they probably would take their place.

But of it though is only that which does stem many say debates and arguments of themselves. But still, to say though that there would only be place for say of such without is anyones guess. But again is little on ideas of interest of article. But to say will always be remembered for that is anyones guess.

Otherwise if anything once someone posts something you maybe don't care for in some means there something there for it. But to say that there normally wouldn't be is also anyones guess as well too.

Otherwise for social sites to say as well for what they would be are probably that of those issues to say if they are, given any reflection of something can always say the different.

So as long as you don't post any images or photos you don't have to hear it really. Mainly photos here on this one though.

But of it at least again though, Facebook Introduces Photo "Tagging" Approval Process.
 

K-zon

Distinguished
Apr 17, 2010
179
0
18,630
0
Can delete one post if interested for Double Post, Most posts here don;t seem to wanna be working at times for whatever reason:

Why not just say anyone who is a memeber of facebook gets the likeness "copyrighted" and only able to be posted if approved?

Probably cuase confusing and complicated issues for awhile, but for the sack of them though would be in lack of others sometimes.

Eventually a point of interest of use will be useless for it though, despite many arguements. But of them though are that of those at least. If not debates within itself though too.

Otherwise to say its a social site, and what else to have on it though but those of your say friends and family. If there was going to be problems with say such ideas, then being left to your own would be another story to say or interest of the like.

Given issues aside is place within what interests are probably not of any, which is probbaly hard founf for what they are. So otherwise issues not aside are probably better placed, and at least the option to work with something takes its place.

Not every photo is the greatest but the greatest sometimes aren;t worth posting either, but that is always deabtable. But of ideas of arguements and debates there is at least a start of some sense with it for some reasonablilty. Otherwise just not wanting to post say images at times is anyones guess.

(Might read towards the end first of this half-way placed paragraph)
Might as well say no to haven't thought or felt that way sometimes and go from there. But again though probably not and say no photos and/or images and go from there. For ideas of take on whats first is probably better left to whats read but changing it does place ideas of what is placed for thoughts of any. Again though is say additional thoughtless places of happening could make there place of say debate or arguement the most, then they probably would take their place.

But of it though is only that which does stem many say debates and arguments of themselves. But still, to say though that there would only be place for say of such without is anyones guess. But again is little on ideas of interest of article. But to say will always be remembered for that is anyones guess.

Otherwise if anything once someone posts something you maybe don't care for in some means there something there for it. But to say that there normally wouldn't be is also anyones guess as well too.

Otherwise for social sites to say as well for what they would be are probably that of those issues to say if they are, given any reflection of something can always say the different.

So as long as you don't post any images or photos you don't have to hear it really. Mainly photos here on this one though.

But of it at least again though, Facebook Introduces Photo "Tagging" Approval Process.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Some of the people that respond here are not thinking of how long it takes to develop an idea that works. Its all trial and error especially for the most successful social network EVER. You don't fix something that is not broken. They had to make sure what they did to counter issues wasn't too complicated or of course Blocking the way people make THEM MONEY. They don't want to offend the users that generate money. Money is important, its the way they can house millions of users and all their stupid photos that shouldn't be up anyway to be tagged in the first place. LOL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Streaming Video & TVs 4
O Streaming Video & TVs 2
J Streaming Video & TVs 1
R Streaming Video & TVs 1
O Streaming Video & TVs 1
B Streaming Video & TVs 2
Jill Scharr Streaming Video & TVs 1
S Streaming Video & TVs 1
tomsguideUS Streaming Video & TVs 0
Marshall Honorof Streaming Video & TVs 2
Jill Scharr Streaming Video & TVs 6
rutherfordsc Streaming Video & TVs 1
G Streaming Video & TVs 4
G Streaming Video & TVs 0
rutherfordsc Streaming Video & TVs 4
G Streaming Video & TVs 0
G Streaming Video & TVs 5
G Streaming Video & TVs 8
G Streaming Video & TVs 1
G Streaming Video & TVs 17

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS