Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (
More info?)
In article <40799dec@news.meer.net>, dankoren@yahoo.com says...
> "Stromm Sarnac" <strommsarnac@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1ae351687accfff89899cf@news.individual.net...
> > In article <407768fd$1@news.meer.net>, dankoren@yahoo.com says...
> > > "Bruce Burden" <brucegb@realtime.net> wrote in message
> > > news:40775958@giga.realtime.net...
> > > > Ron Hubbard <notat@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > :
> > > > : It did and works perfectly, but does anyone know if it's true that
> > > > : HP ships used parts without telling customers what they are
> > > > : buying?
> > > > :
> > > > They should NOT be doing that, since a part advertised and
> > > > sold as new has to be, well, new.
> > > >
> > > > The problem, of course, is to catch them doing that. It is
> > > > easy to claim XYZ Company does something, to actually prove it
> > > > is another...
> > >
> > > Ah, but there is a catch.
> > >
> > > The warranty is on the complete laptop, not on
> > > individual parts. Say the CD-ROM drive breaks
> > > and you send the laptop back to the vendor for
> > > repair -- or they send you a replacement part
> > > by mail. It is perfectly legal for the drive
> > > (or any part) they send you not to be new, as
> > > long as it fixes the problem.
> > >
> > > Likewise, there is no legal requirement that
> > > every part used in building a computer sold
> > > as "new" must be itself new and never used
> > > previously.
> > >
> >
> > Um, in the US yes there is. It is part of the
> > laws governing retail sales that any part of an
> > purchase sold as NEW must be new. If there is
> > a single item that's not NEW, the whole can not
> > be sold as NEW.
>
>
> Then you should be reassured that not one computer
> vendor's product would meet your strict literalist
> reading of this law. To understand why, you only
> need to consider the manufacturing process for a
> PC or workstation.
>
> Components get picked and inserted/soldered into a
> PCB or a motherboard. The PCB is then tested, and
> if it fails to pass all the tests, it is scrapped.
>
> What that means is that *any* component that can
> be recovered and re-used will be recovered, tested
> again individually, then put back into the process.
>
> Next, PCB's and motherboards are assembled into a
> PC or workstation. The PC is then system tested.
>
> If it fails, it is taken apart, and its components
> are again recycled to whatever extent possible.
>
> And all this is perfectly legal, because none of
> them have been *SOLD* as a product (or part of a
> product) to anyone yet. The legal definition of
> *NEW* parts is based on whether the parts have
> been previously *SOLD*, not on whether they may
> have been put through multiple build/test cycles.
>
> And to top everything: computer vendors regularly
> take products off the line or from their warehouses
> and use them internally for up to 3 months, then
> they can still sell them as new.
And the laws state, they are breaking the law. These items are to be
sold as display, internal or simply used. A company is not legally
allowed to use items not transferred to "internal use". Items done so,
go follow deprecitive regulations and can not be sold for "retail"
pricing.
> If you think that *NEW* in a legal sense means
> "no part of it has ever been used before", you
> would be wrong. "New" simply means the complete
> product has never been sold before to an outside
> customer.
Not something I defined, my mistake. In the US, used is define by the
packaging. Once the item has been packaged for sale, if it has been
opened, that item is no longer new. Many companies learned this the
hardware (MicroCenter, CompUSA, OfficeMax, BestBuy, etc.)
Items that failed the manufacturing QA, don't qualify as used (sadly)
in the US.
>
> And if you wonder where do I take my information
> from, I've been working in the computer industry
> for almost 30 years. All of it is verifiable and
> measurable.
Same here, and I even have friends that work in the manufacturing part
of it.