Formal Complaint About Facebook Filed With FTC

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

m3kt3k

Distinguished
Dec 4, 2006
59
0
18,580
SOOOOO Ill admit I never read the terms etc for facebook BUUT Im pretty sure they would have had a clause that says "We reserve the right to change etc etc etc" in it somewhere. Would that not give them the right to do what they damn well pleased?
 

reconspartan

Distinguished
Oct 24, 2008
44
0
18,580
[citation][nom]frozenlead[/nom]...do we have the right (or the merit) to complain about a free service? I'm sure Facebook would follow what you wanted if you, you know, paid them.[/citation]

I agree. People don't pay for FB and they aren't required to use it. Seems to me like FB can do whatever it wants. This complaint sounds like a load of shit though. The people complaining probably don't care about the changes and were at least aware of them; they're just a bunch of douches trying to sue for some big money. I hate people like that.
 

Hilarion

Distinguished
Feb 12, 2008
152
0
18,630
[citation][nom]reconspartan[/nom]I agree. People don't pay for FB and they aren't required to use it. Seems to me like FB can do whatever it wants. This complaint sounds like a load of shit though. The people complaining probably don't care about the changes and were at least aware of them; they're just a bunch of douches trying to sue for some big money. I hate people like that.[/citation]
Facebook is asking you to "Trust Us" with your information and then they go and make it available to the whole world by changing the privacy settings. The suggested defaults expose a LOT more of your information and information which you used to be able to keep private now cannot be made private. That is not something that shines with "Trust Us" and should never have happened.
 

jalek

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2007
156
0
18,630
Took like a minute to log in and adjust the settings.
That's about the amount of time I spend on it a month anyway.
 

santeana

Distinguished
Apr 18, 2003
88
0
18,580
[citation][nom]XZaapryca[/nom]FB made the default privacy settings lower, but in doing so they reset EVERYONE'S privacy levels to this new starting point. So stuff that was very private before is not now, unless you went back in to redo your privacy settings afterwards.[/citation]

No they didn't. They offered up a choice when I logged in and asked whether I wanted to use the new default settings or us my old settings. I chose the old ones and everything is exactly how I left it.
Now, I'm not a 100% on this part, but if I'm not mistaken, they changed it to offer more control. They slacked the defaults back a bit because people before were complaining that no one could find them on FB in the search. So they stopped those complaints, only to start up a whole new slew of them.
 

dmwright

Distinguished
Aug 9, 2009
33
0
18,580
[citation][nom]santeana[/nom]No they didn't. They offered up a choice when I logged in and asked whether I wanted to use the new default settings or us my old settings. I chose the old ones and everything is exactly how I left it.Now, I'm not a 100% on this part, but if I'm not mistaken, they changed it to offer more control. They slacked the defaults back a bit because people before were complaining that no one could find them on FB in the search. So they stopped those complaints, only to start up a whole new slew of them.[/citation]

I had a slightly different experience. I was given a selection to keep the old settings or change to the new ones. I did as you did, selected the old settings. And due to this article I decided to check again, and found that there were quite a few settings that were set to "Everyone". I obviously don't share inappropriate information on FB, but I did find it inconvenient as I do like to keep the information I share private within family/friends. And sharing your favorite movies with people make it easier for them to REMEMBER, especially when you have a couple hundred friends. :p

I personally use FB as I travel a lot and it allows me to keep in touch with friends and family.

As for others who say they do not like FB, everyone has their own choice, but people don't live the same in every part of the world. I know many Asians who use the service and they find it to be more than just a hobby.

As an American, I can understand the problems with privacy, but it does seem that we are reluctant to use technology such as this to improve our relationships. "Ideally" it would be just great to meet all your friends, but if you are trying to stay in contact with friends from your early school years (Middle/High School) as many tend to travel to other cities looking for work, etc...

It can be argued that snail-mail/email/websites can be used instead, but this is an idea to incorporate all of them together. If you choose your friends correctly, you shouldn't care what they post on your FB and who reads it, as they are your friends. If you need serious talk (1-on-1) obviously you wouldn't talk about them in public, but this is the new age and with many people spending countless hours on the internet, shopping, studying, etc... It would seem to follow that we also brought our relationships online.

I understand this post is about privacy, but I thought I would also incorporate some replies to other messages and bring a different point of view to the table about social websites.

 

justiceguy216

Distinguished
Aug 13, 2009
32
0
18,580
[citation][nom]michaelahess[/nom]DON'T USE FACEBOOK!!!! Simple solution, and one that will make your life better overall.[/citation]
not true, a girl just invited me to a party via FACEBOOK. Seriously, a real GIRL!!
 

eccentric909

Distinguished
Oct 4, 2006
228
0
18,830
[citation][nom]phillipmeyers99[/nom]I look at the people who file the complaint and i wonder when America became such pussies. For the love of god people, that empty air chamber above your shoulders, you must use it once in a while. The site clearly tells you settings have changed, check yours now, then it will force you to after a week even if you have already done so. Stupid people who are to dumb or ignorant to read these messages or just ignore them should be sued by the rest of us for wasting space and oxygen. We get it people your DUMB, your mom wipes your butt and thinking for yourself is not something you can do. IF you can't use the site or don't get it delete your account, maybe FB should just delete accounts if you do not change the settings after 2 weeks, then these people would cry and bitch why did it do this, i ignored everything in front of me because i had to update my status and could not take the 2 minutes to run thru it.[/citation]

Yes, lets bash all americans for what a tiny special interest group is saying/doing. I mean, all americans are the same, right?
 

OsirisZero

Distinguished
Jul 16, 2009
4
0
18,510
Too bad the FTC can't regulate the internet. Also, too bad that people sign up for a Facebook account of their own free will. I guess then that it's also too bad that idiots post information about themselves on the internet that they don't want others to see, and then act surprised or get mad when somehow others may find a way to access it (especially when you yourself call attention to said details). Failing these, it's too bad that they decided to make any possible "privacy" (since it's only information they themselves are giving willingly) issues moot by calling attention to all of their private matters by stupidly trying to get the FTC involved (which can't do anything about anything involving the internet outside of harassing ISPs or a company at large for bad business practices (and not necessarily because of internet activities)) Facebook likely posted all the changes that would be made by switching to the new privacy agreements which you yourself HAVE TO agree to to be affected by them. So, as usual, you're the only one to blame for your own situation.

Nice.

Also, Facebook has free registration, so stop bitching. If you don't like it, use something else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.