Froyo Update: Carriers Control Who Has Tethering

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

egidem

Distinguished
Sep 3, 2009
34
0
18,580
[citation][nom]elasticman[/nom]im sorry , this might be a silly question...but can somebody explain to me what does tethering mean??[/citation]

Tethering is a means of using your mobile device phone's internet access and use it to another device (like plugging in your 3G phone in your laptop and surfing the phone's web from the laptop via wifi or the USB cable).

Personally, Google is doing some cool features in their Froyo update. They are working on an auto translation text-to-speech voice mod (chances that apple is working on something like that are ZERO). I love my Nexus One!

GO ANDOID!! :D
 

drakenviator

Distinguished
Apr 8, 2008
9
0
18,510
[citation][nom]thekurrgan[/nom]... Bottom line: They dont want to fix the problem so they make it financially unattractive.[/citation]

First off GREAT comments... Second the reason why this will never happen is that doing so will cost more sort term then any of the above mentioned providers are willing to spend. Also they like locking people to their frequencies because it makes it harder to switch services as you need to buy a new phone each time. They also have a LOT of money invested into leasing their particular frequencies from the GOV.

I agree a national standard (or heck international as you suggested) would be a great idea but the second you talk about doing it I promise you people are going to start calling you a Socialist and burn you in effigy.

So in short business wins consumers get the shaft... (again)

Oh well I still might write my senator and tell him to do this!
 

Skid

Distinguished
Apr 24, 2009
52
0
18,580
I pay for the bandwidth / data as an extra on my contract anyway, it should be up to me how I use that data not the carriers.
 

hillarymakesmecry

Distinguished
Feb 24, 2009
293
0
18,930
[citation][nom]thekurrgan[/nom]Not to be devils advocate here, but data ver the air is simply more expensive than any traditional method of providing an internet connection. A tower can only provide so much throughput per sector, and there can only be so many towers in a given area.Cellular carriers are limited greatly by the frequency limitation they have. Here is why data pricing is screwed: There are 4 incompatible carriers operating in the US. From a technology stand point, if you eliminated the 4 companies ability to use a seperate system that must share the air with each other, and put it all together into ONE system that can occupy that entire spectrum, then it would be possible to serve up MUCH more bandwidth for less. Scenario: 1 Carrier style.Screw CDMA, go to GSM / UMTS like the rest of the modern world. There is sprint / Verizons range freed up. Combine T-Mobiles AWS and AT&T's standard 3G + 850mhz UMTS. Now everyone is at 7.2Mbit theoretical link speed on their devices, AND these devices can roam between ALL of the spectrum allocated for cellular providers. This would let the 1 provider have up to 4 times the amount of bandwidth PER tower, as well as opens up a plethora of possibilities for coverage and what not. You then use the existing carriers to pipe in the telephony end of this as well as the data. You then purchase your "share" of this from whomever you choose. This wouldd be similar to the "Direct access" PG&E now offers and fall into the same method used by the national power grid. It would also save the companies money, and frankly with landlines going the way of the dinosaur, it seems like this may be the next step in eveolution for the phone company. But, at any rate the rapage has to stop.TO charge additional for tethering at CURRENT makes HALF sense, but it could be done for a much lower cost than what is charged. Next level of reality: If you want free tethering you get it. I've not seen an iPhone / Android I couldnt tether on yet, legit or not. Bottom line: They dont want to fix the problem so they make it financially unattractive.[/citation]


I say screw GSM. It makes anything around it with a speaker make noise when on a call or switching towers and has lower call quality with more dropped calls. Sounds inferior to me.

I guess that's why we have a choice??

And BTW, China is on CDMA so not "the whole world" is on GSM. Europe isn't "the whole world"
 
G

Guest

Guest
The real issue is, the telecoms are still charging a lot for phone usage. Telephone landlines have used 8 kbit/s quality for over a half a century. You're telling me that my $30/mo data plan can't transfer realtime 8 kbit/s audio? I should be able to just pay $30-$40 a month for my data connection and it should handle the phone calls digitally... hell, video should be no problem even, with 4G... and I'll pick up my HTC Evo next Friday!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.