[citation][nom]snowzsan[/nom]If they banned Furbies because they could "record and repeat" vital information, I wonder how they came to that assumption? Just imagine the agent sitting there at his desk talking "spec ops" chatter with his semi-retarded furby?Not only that, I don't recall them banning "yak-baks" and those were SPECIFICALLY designed to record and playback.[/citation]
They said, if inadvertently someone bought it as a gift, talked to someone forgetting furby was around, then would bring it home. Some crap like that.
Never heard of "yak-baks". Don't work for government stuff, just a private "consulting" agency where they care about secrecy. But yeah, like they disable all usb ports, but if you reboot the computer with the usb key in, it detects it. Or if you download an .exe, they won't run it, but you download a .zip, don't extract it (that is blocked), but just view it then run it, sure enough, it runs.
I've told a few of my superiors about the security lapses, and then they see me as a security threat. Trust me, if I wanted to do damage, I would and not talk about it. The gaps are so wide it's scary. And management, they are worried about "Furby", because it makes the news. I've never found any upper management that could talk technically, or even just respect it. They just fear it. And ban it when they don't understand it, but when they love it like their cellphones, then too bad, it stays, no matter what the risk.