[citation][nom]omnimodis78[/nom]Flawed point of view. Google is not a public service provider that invest its own money to provide people with a product/service, people, as in you and I, are the byproducts, the "end-product" actually of their primary business: advertising licenses. Have you ever wondered how is it possible that they are a multi-billion dollar company and yet those using their search engines, browsers, etc don't pay for them? ... think about that one please. They are selling something that somebody is paying good money for - and if it's not us paying for their stuff, then who is? And what is it that they are selling?[/citation]
I don't think his view is flawed. Yes, we the consumer fund many of their products directly or indirectly, but the point he was making is that Google has provided a lot of services that do not really show a return, justifiable by the expense. YouTube is/was losing money forever. They have probably lost money on Android thus far, although I'm sure long term it will start making them money. Most companies don't provide any services that they don't make a large profit on directly.