[citation][nom]WhySoBluePandaBear[/nom]Look alike huh? How many look alikes will have a top-hat, curly hair, glasses, a nose piercing and happen to be a guitar rock star? Activision without doubt had the intention of people wanting to think this to be Slash. They knew Slash was a rock star icon and knew it would boost sales. Seriously, name me ANY other rock stars who wore top hats, had long, dark curly hair and a nose piercing. That's like copying someone's entire career image and instead of them having brown eyes, they give them green eyes, and try to play that "It's different" card. We all know the intent of Activision. on this one...It wasn't some coincidence.[/citation]
Look, I have no illusions that they accidentally copied Slash's image. Of course they did! The point is, you can't own an image! See the Vampira vs. Elvira lawsuit for an example of this.
Activision can easily claim they were just using the image of one of the many Slash impersonators, which also are legally in the clear.
If you just look at your silly statement "How many look alikes will have a top-hat, curly hair, glasses, a nose piercing and happen to be a guitar rock star," the problem becomes clear.
Most of the attributes you mentioned are mundane items and millions of people have them. With the exception of the top hat, probably thousands have all of them combined. Undoubtedly, there are some that even wear the top hat and are impersonators (which is not illegal). You seem to be giving special rights to the "rock star" just because he is famous. Looking a certain way and being famous does not give you the right to cash every time someone or something looks like you.
"That's like copying someone's entire career image"...
Artists often copy each other's images, by dressing, looking or acting like another artist. This is not illegal. It's how fads occur (hair bands, for example).