- Status
- Sep 6, 2008
- 3,485
- 0
- 20,730
[citation][nom]Socrates047[/nom]"It's not the camera that's the problem...The miniskirts are.If women don't want someone (or something) peeking under their miniskirts, don't wear them I'd say..."men are the problem,lol[/citation]
But what if it's the standard uniform in Japan?
But what if it's the standard uniform in Japan?
The fact that the guy thought this would be undetectable with the dimensions on the nano is retarded anyway. Plus the fact that the nano doesn't come with a clip means the mounting would be awkward and more likely to be dropped/slip out. Seems like he was probably using what was on hand for the thrill to see if he could get away with it.
If he was really trying to be undetectable he would have used something more like this:
http
/www.spygadgets.com/mini-dv-camcorder.html
Small enough to fit neatly into a shoe with clip included which could secure it to a center-of-tongue lace holder. Has enough space and battery power to run for two hours non-stop, more than long enough to wander about town and get some viable footage.
Not that I care about any of this, mind you. Just saying it wouldn't take much thought to come up with a more viable solution than the one used.
Of course, if he'd had enough time to come up with some thoughts about what he was doing instead of just doing it, he might have changed his mind. Guess this is what happens when you think with the wrong head.
If he was really trying to be undetectable he would have used something more like this:
http
/www.spygadgets.com/mini-dv-camcorder.htmlSmall enough to fit neatly into a shoe with clip included which could secure it to a center-of-tongue lace holder. Has enough space and battery power to run for two hours non-stop, more than long enough to wander about town and get some viable footage.
Not that I care about any of this, mind you. Just saying it wouldn't take much thought to come up with a more viable solution than the one used.
Of course, if he'd had enough time to come up with some thoughts about what he was doing instead of just doing it, he might have changed his mind. Guess this is what happens when you think with the wrong head.
He's just testing Apple's new "iShoe".....and the "i"...is an eye...DOH!
And to most of you, its psychological thing for this guy and most people who strange issues. Some people get turned on just doing this kinda of stuff vs. watch porn or visiting your adult store.
And to most of you, its psychological thing for this guy and most people who strange issues. Some people get turned on just doing this kinda of stuff vs. watch porn or visiting your adult store.
As much as I dont like Apple for a long while now ad have an old Ipod on the side I find it really useless to even mention this as news.. Are you seriously finding this news or you want me to show you my private collection? That alone takes me a few years back. Never upskirt of strangers cause that would be half like theft for me and half drooler action and im far from it. But Ever since people started using digital cams that are small enough to fit in one hand this has been going on. Really nothing new here.
nelson_nel
Distinguished
- Feb 4, 2009
- 98
- 0
- 18,580
[citation][nom]Honis[/nom]This has been happening for decades with thousands of different picture taking media.Just because a guy with an apple product got caught using it for such purposes does not make this news. Time for you people to read some real news where they have been reporting this and other things for years.[/citation]
Thank you.
Thank you.
eccentric909
Distinguished
- Oct 4, 2006
- 228
- 0
- 18,830
[citation][nom]ProDigit80[/nom]It's not the camera that's the problem...The miniskirts are.If women don't want someone (or something) peeking under their miniskirts, don't wear them I'd say...[/citation]
I hope you're not being serious. You're going to blame the woman, because the man couldn't control himself? What an ass backwards way of looking at this. Someone wearing a provacative outfit, might want or like attention, but that doesn't give someone a free ticket to video tape them without consent, especially in a situation such as this. The lecherous fool is the one at fault, not the woman. Provacative clothing is not an invitation for someone to break the law and invade someone's privacy.
[citation][nom]montezuma[/nom]Seriously? A company thinks it can ban the use of a MP3 player with a camera because some people would misuse it? Yeah, I do not see that actually happening. They can have a written rule, but I would refuse to follow it. Talk about asinine.[/citation]
If you would 'refuse to follow it', you can just go somewhere else, because they'd ban you from the gym. It's private property, they can easily make this rule and enforce it, and you can feel free to take your money somewhere else. The US is a free country, but that doesn't mean you can act without consequence and ignore the rules of an establishment. The rule is not discriminating against you, nor is it impeding on your ability to work-out somewhere else which doesn't have said rule.
I hope you're not being serious. You're going to blame the woman, because the man couldn't control himself? What an ass backwards way of looking at this. Someone wearing a provacative outfit, might want or like attention, but that doesn't give someone a free ticket to video tape them without consent, especially in a situation such as this. The lecherous fool is the one at fault, not the woman. Provacative clothing is not an invitation for someone to break the law and invade someone's privacy.
[citation][nom]montezuma[/nom]Seriously? A company thinks it can ban the use of a MP3 player with a camera because some people would misuse it? Yeah, I do not see that actually happening. They can have a written rule, but I would refuse to follow it. Talk about asinine.[/citation]
If you would 'refuse to follow it', you can just go somewhere else, because they'd ban you from the gym. It's private property, they can easily make this rule and enforce it, and you can feel free to take your money somewhere else. The US is a free country, but that doesn't mean you can act without consequence and ignore the rules of an establishment. The rule is not discriminating against you, nor is it impeding on your ability to work-out somewhere else which doesn't have said rule.
- Status
Similar threads
Facebook
Twitter