[citation][nom]elyan[/nom]secondly it is a Legal binding US Patent. Therefore they have every right to pursue injunctive action aganst M$ IMO.[/citation]
in how the laws are implementated that's an empty statement, anyone can sue anyone, for anything, the courts determine legality. its also well known that us patent system is broken and regularly abused. company's like microsoft, sun, ect are sued all the time and are sueing all the time, it's a part of doing business, setting a case does not imply legal justice, correctness, ect, it's often just a business financial calculation, it will cost me x to fight it all the way and x - y to settle it, so if its cheaper to settle it, then settle it. regardless of legal precedence. just because you have a patent does not mean you will win, or are correct to have that patent, the patent office give out patent in exchange for $$$, they have a financial insentive, like us financial products rating agencies to give ratings, to give patents, they get money, if they didn't give them and passed the problem to the courts, then they would not make as much money as they do...