Microsoft Working on XP for OLPC

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Guest

Guest
There's a typo there in a quote from the webpage. It appears that the quote "you should not yet assume that Windows on the XO is a done deal" was changed to "You should not assume that Windows on the XP is a done deal." XO is not a spelling mistake, it's the name of the OLPC computer.
 
G

Guest

Guest
OLPC isnt about operating systems. its about OLPC, it has simple tasks that it needs to be done. any additions can be to that framework. it doesnt matter that it runs linux. main concern is about computing. im not sure what windows wants to bring in ? microsoft had a very lax attitude towards security in the pursuit of getting custoemrs first, think about securing it later. but, why would children need to learn about windows, instead they could very well be happy with simple computing ? it sounds like the drug dealers approaching the teenagers.
 
G

Guest

Guest
The purpose of OLPC was to bring computers to children in less-privileged countries, without the goal of profit. Microsoft's only goal is profit. I find it despicable that Microsoft would even consider charging for the XO version of Windows. I think they have enough cash on hand to just take the hit, after all, they're just revamping an OS they plan to discontinue in 2009 anyway. Also brings up an interesting point, is the Vista Kernel so bloated that it would be impossible to scale down for the XO?
 
G

Guest

Guest
I agree with the drug-dealer comment. IF Microsoft can get a trimmed-down version of Windows XP working on an OLPC, then they'll probably sell it at $3, just like in China. THAT is the drug-dealer hook. Once they get the students used to using Microsoft, and have all their data in a proprietary Microsoft format (e.g. OOXML) the prices will rise until, like here in the States, the cost of software will far exceed the cost of the hardware.

The OLPC was designed from the start to be a low-cost computer. It's supplied with a minimal amount of semi-permanent storage, in the form of flash memory. It's also supplied with a low-power processor so that it can be recharged by hand, rather than require a dependable electrical grid throughout the region of use. That storage is big enough for a distribution of the Linux operating system and a few critical applications, such as web browsing, email, and word-processing. It is NOT a large enough storage nor a fast enough processing platform to support bloated software.

I have to wonder what Microsoft intends to remove from "XP" to make it OLPC-compatible. They've testified (under oath) that everything there was necessary. Either they lied <feigning shock> or they're expecting to dress-up an even older version of Windows (say, 98SE?) to LOOK like XP, or they will expect users to "upgrade" the OLPC with extra flash memory and faster processor to run it.

Whatever the case is, I'd bet that the "applications" will be web-based, which really WILL lock the users into paying ever-increasing taxes to see their own documents. Why have a web-based application if you're going to store the data locally? No, no, no... Store it up on a Microsoft server, where it will be "safe" and you'll always have access to it. "Oh, did we forget to remind you that there will be a fee for storage? Gotcha!"
 
G

Guest

Guest
Microsoft has already made a slimmed down version of XP. The version is called WinFLP{Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs}. See Wiki. I have used it. It seems to be just a functional as XP Pro. The minimum system requiremets are very low. Should run on OLPC just fine. IDK why its taken them a year to build a OS for it. Thats a joke. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Fundamentals_for_Legacy_PCs
 
G

Guest

Guest
I think all of you are looking at this from the wrong perspective. Microsoft at the moment is on the defensive. You think M$ is thinking of the pore kids from some third world county? What is the concept of the program, buy one for you're kid and send one to some kid. Guess what will happen if al the US kids grow up using Linux? Right... next step Linux adopted in school since everyone knows it. Adoption in school... do I need to map out everything all the way to corporate level? I think you all get the point. I hope their financial influence will not win on this one.
 

jalek

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2007
156
0
18,630
0
They must be having trouble getting the copy protection, authentication, activation, calling home, etc. to work with such limited computing power.

These machines are meant to be robust and efficient, MS has nothing to offer.
 
G

Guest

Guest
If Win makes its way on to an OLPC, 80% of the OLPC staff has vowed to quit. I'd be surprised if this ever makes it further than an (un)news story.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Check out these articles about Gates's initial reaction to OLPC:

http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2006/03/bill_gates_crit.html
http://news.digitaltrends.com/news/story/9795/gates_derides_mits_100_olpc_laptop
http://www.engadget.com/2006/03/16/bill-gates-has-his-say-of-things/
http://www.digi-help.com/gadgets/bill-gates-olpc.asp
http://news.mongabay.com/2006/0315-gates.html
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/microsoft-xp-olpc,news-62.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/30/technology/30gates.html?ex=1296277200&en=4e586bd7c9a4b218&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
E Streaming Video & TVs 4
abdabra Streaming Video & TVs 1
R Streaming Video & TVs 0
L Streaming Video & TVs 3
chilly601 Streaming Video & TVs 2
L Streaming Video & TVs 3
Marshall Honorof Streaming Video & TVs 1
Marshall Honorof Streaming Video & TVs 1
G Streaming Video & TVs 0
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 16
G Streaming Video & TVs 17
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 20
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 35
G Streaming Video & TVs 50
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 15
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 25
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 3
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 29
G Streaming Video & TVs 13
G Streaming Video & TVs 3

ASK THE COMMUNITY