[citation][nom]back_by_demand[/nom]Interesting that almost everyone is dissing this project, regardless of price.Yet.A motion controller was also panned universally as a kiddy fad and Nintendo have sold bucketloads and put the Xbox and PS3 into 2nd and 3rd place in large parts of the world.It makes good business sense.If it's such a stupid idea, how come both Microsoft and Sony are copying it?Hardcore FPS gamers will not buy it, but that's no reason that it shouldn't be made for the people that will, because even if you don't want to pay for it plenty of others will.[/citation]
Natal's biggest flaw is the mobility of the user. Since you have to move your whole body for Natal, this might be a problem. Anyone with a non-standard body shape, or people who have limited mobility will have issues. I can't imagine Natal is going to be able to properly detect people in a wheel chair, nor people missing a limb. The simplicity of Wii, while not perfect, still allows some limited use of the Wii Motion sensor to those individuals.
I mean, I can see the commercial now, 3 able-bodied friends playing the latest Monkey Ball rip-off on the 360, while their fourth, wheel-chair bound friend sits to the side, unable to participate. Seriously, that single image getting out to the general public would not only kill Natal, but possibly the entire XBox line. What's the new slogan? "X-Box 360, it ain't for cripples!"?