[citation][nom]martin0642[/nom]We need less of the reactionary knee-jerk responses I see here and more actual thought. Everytime anything involves "an innocent little child" people get all stupid and throw reality out the door. More evil is done in this world "to protect the children" than any other BS cause I can think of.Did the poster call the lady? No. Did he harm anyone? No. Did he break a law? Not that I can tell. Being a jerk is not illegal.At most it was against MS terms of service EULA, which is not a legal issue, and at most could get your contract with Microsoft canceled. Before we know it some idiot is going to be "outraged" and "call for new legislation" to "combat this threat" and what it will really end up doing is curtailing our personal freedoms and civil liberties and not have any effect on protecting the "children" that were never in any real danger anyway.More thought, less emotional antics and poorly constructed moral superiority.[/citation]
Not illegal? It's called child laundering. Whether the person said it was a "joke" or not is irrelevant.
I thought this was kind of funny too: "Manos remained confused until she received the 19th call. By then, she had a gut feeling that something was going on. "I knew something wasn't right," she said."
Really? it took 19 calls to realize something wasn't right?