tester24
Distinguished
[citation][nom]Kingssman[/nom]Good for them for finding water on the moon. but I doubt its anything to sustain a station, let alone have enough water to fill a well. Besides, problems with the moon base is its 3 days away (more distance time) its low gravity (still suffer muscle deteriation without having a benefit of weightlessness in construction) if located on the south pole near the water source it wont get as much sunlight as the on the light side of the moon. The moon only serves as a 2nd launch pad or a place to mount radio telescopes. It would prove to be more difficult to maintain and resupply than a space station. Course space stations have that problem of getting sucked into earth's gravity.[/citation]
Well... I remember watching a program on discovery program they took moonrocks from the luner landing missions (apollo) and extracted water from the dust. I think the moon would be a better base than the ISS (International Space Station). At least you could just keep adding on to it. Not to meantion not having to worry about space debris from hitting it, lots of that crap around earth. Being on the side facing earth you would be protected more from meteors.
Also they have exercise equipment to prevent muscle deterioration.
Well... I remember watching a program on discovery program they took moonrocks from the luner landing missions (apollo) and extracted water from the dust. I think the moon would be a better base than the ISS (International Space Station). At least you could just keep adding on to it. Not to meantion not having to worry about space debris from hitting it, lots of that crap around earth. Being on the side facing earth you would be protected more from meteors.
Also they have exercise equipment to prevent muscle deterioration.