G
Guest
Guest
Actually "cold fusion" is holy grail since it's unachievable.
"Regular" fusion requires high temperature magnetic confimenent, around 100 megakelvins (yeah 100 milion degrees) and not hydrogen itself, but its unstable isotopes, deuterium and tritium, which combined give helium plus a vast amount of energy.
The issue with current systems is the power input being higher than the output, due to high magnetic fields provided by coils that should be around -250 K, next to a wall which contains ions at 100 million degrees.
The theory works, the issue is to make it a stable reaction (needs a very pure environment and impurities arise from the containing walls due to, you know, 100 million degrees).
And also, of course, a proper way to extract the heat from it and direct it to a turbine with some water.
I've read some "dads" being nuclear physicists, or some wikipedia readers, but you should check your facts.
I'm designing a core simulator for ITER.
"Regular" fusion requires high temperature magnetic confimenent, around 100 megakelvins (yeah 100 milion degrees) and not hydrogen itself, but its unstable isotopes, deuterium and tritium, which combined give helium plus a vast amount of energy.
The issue with current systems is the power input being higher than the output, due to high magnetic fields provided by coils that should be around -250 K, next to a wall which contains ions at 100 million degrees.
The theory works, the issue is to make it a stable reaction (needs a very pure environment and impurities arise from the containing walls due to, you know, 100 million degrees).
And also, of course, a proper way to extract the heat from it and direct it to a turbine with some water.
I've read some "dads" being nuclear physicists, or some wikipedia readers, but you should check your facts.
I'm designing a core simulator for ITER.