Tindytim
Distinguished
[citation][nom]The_Blood_Raven[/nom]Wow you need to get out. Starting a political rant when there was none.[/citation]
I wasn't the first to bring up Politics. Obama's a Mactard, and I don't like that.
[citation][nom]The_Blood_Raven[/nom] When Chrysler goes under I want you to tell me it was better to my face as millions lose their jobs.[/citation]
The reason those companies went under is because of an overly powerful union. By bailing them out, we allow that Union to continue. There are certain lines each side cannot cross without consequences.
If a company doesn't pay their workers enough, they will no longer have a work force, and go out of business. However, if I union gets wages up so high that the company can no longer turn a profit, the company goes out of business.
Those Autoworkers were being paid $80/hour. Well above living wage. To do what? work on an assembly line. It's the Unions fault for being selfish, and the Business's fault for allowing them to go that far. We need to make an example, rather than letting an overbearing Union continue.
I wasn't the first to bring up Politics. Obama's a Mactard, and I don't like that.
[citation][nom]The_Blood_Raven[/nom] When Chrysler goes under I want you to tell me it was better to my face as millions lose their jobs.[/citation]
The reason those companies went under is because of an overly powerful union. By bailing them out, we allow that Union to continue. There are certain lines each side cannot cross without consequences.
If a company doesn't pay their workers enough, they will no longer have a work force, and go out of business. However, if I union gets wages up so high that the company can no longer turn a profit, the company goes out of business.
Those Autoworkers were being paid $80/hour. Well above living wage. To do what? work on an assembly line. It's the Unions fault for being selfish, and the Business's fault for allowing them to go that far. We need to make an example, rather than letting an overbearing Union continue.