Patent Approved: Apple Now Owns "Slide to Unlock"

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

mrpijey

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2009
39
0
18,580
[citation][nom]thrasher32[/nom]While you're down there fellating Apple, will you see if you can find my contact lens?[/citation]

That explains why you didn't read my post since you're evidently blind. Perhaps you should take the time to read first before you comment. But I guess it's more important for you to spew your hate than to carry a mature conversation. Too bad. Don't bother responding unless it's intelligent.

As I said, I don't support Apple in this and I frankly think both Apple and Samsung are lame for doing this, but both of them used a pretty big loop hole and are not throwing rocks at eachother. Others will follow since Google, Intel, Microsoft etc are hoarding patents just in case...

[citation][nom]NoNeedToSue[/nom]@mrpijeyand thats all well and good if patents were to be used for defensive means only, but Apple has demonstrated that they are more then happy to use these patents offensively, they did not patent these ideas just so someone else dont patent them, they patent these ideas to exclusively exclude other from using themAnd i fully understand the concept of business killed or be killed i cant help but look at Nokia and Ericsson (now Sony) who are sitting on a heap loads of telecoms patents and until recently, did not decide to sue the pants of everyone and their gran (it should also noted that Samsung holds a ridiculously large patent port folio)[/citation]

Um, the point of taking a patent is to prevent others from using the same idea, i.e have exclusive rights to the technology. But the patent system as it is today is abused. It was created to allow inventors to make a profit on their invention before it became free for all, but these days corps use it to stall development and kill competition. Both Apple and Samsung are major players so both of them suit up with crappy patents, APPROVED patents. And this is where it went wrong. If it weren't possible to patent basic ideas and non-innovative ideas then no one would bother with this sillyness. Samsung and Apple are just playing the patent game according to what law approves.

What has to be done is to redo the entire patent system and throw out all stupid patents like these. Then this entire childish game will go away. Until that happens businesses will hoard patents and use them wherever they seem fit to regain a steady foothold on the market.

It's just business. Bad business but still business. And there are still many worse things to take care of while we're at it, such as slave labor etc.
 
G

Guest

Guest
As a patriotic and loyal American, this just plain embarrasses me. I love my country but some government agencies? Not soo much :(

-Clonazepam
 

spiketheaardvark

Distinguished
Apr 14, 2009
23
0
18,570
This sounds like it patents any interaction with a touch screen to unlock it assuming it's predefined. Which it the only way you can really interact with a touch screen. Interpreted broadly it sounds like any phone not using physical buttons to unlock the screen is in violation. It would be like patenting pushing a set of keys on a keyboard to log onto a desktop was patentable.

Someone slap the people at the patent office. How can they take years to give anyway patents to any random thing people send in.
 

growup

Distinguished
Jan 28, 2011
24
0
18,560
--------------------------------------------------
- SLIDE TO UNLOCK -
- -
--------------------------------------------------

OH NOES IM SUED! xD
 

mcd023

Distinguished
Nov 9, 2010
144
0
18,630
[citation][nom]stereopsis[/nom]AND how the hell do you patent a GESTURE???[/citation]
not "A gesture," apparently all gestures are covered
 
G

Guest

Guest
Apple knows it has no future. Ipod is in decline, only products left are iphone and ipad and they are losing the battle. So the only way to stay alive is to be patent troll and patent everything the competitions has already done. I don't think iTV will be a hit either.
 

STravis

Distinguished
Nov 3, 2009
238
0
18,830
[citation][nom]fhaghd[/nom]Apple knows it has no future. Ipod is in decline, only products left are iphone and ipad and they are losing the battle. So the only way to stay alive is to be patent troll and patent everything the competitions has already done. I don't think iTV will be a hit either.[/citation]

Yup - poor Apple, no future....stock price > $400, $80B in cash and people gobbling up their products..what can they do to survive???

 
G

Guest

Guest
if software could be patented, then the english language should be patentable.

i'm gonna patent "a way of communicating in order to convey any scenario relating to an action being performed on an object by the use of a noun in combination with a verb. for example, 'suck your own dick'"
 

DroKing

Distinguished
Feb 14, 2010
127
0
18,630
You kidding me? There were touchscreen phones with such gesture before Iphones even existed yet this got approved? *shakes my head* Ok now this crap is getting dumber!
 
G

Guest

Guest
@mrpijey

to quote

"The current twisted and abused patent rules are fully open for abuse, and if Apple doesn't patent it someone else will"

That implies that Apple is patenting stuff to prevent themselves getting sued. There are a few companies that actually do patent stuff to prevent themselves being sued rather to use it to deny access to other folks, it's also handy if you want to employ technologies patented by other folks, in fact the telcon industry is a cross licensing nightmare

patents were never designed to prevent access to technology, they were designed to protect investment spent in developing an idea/solution, case in point is if two entities developed very similar ideas through their own research and development, both companies would be allowed to employed said ideas because they both invested time and money to develop the idea as long as one does not plagiarism the other directly or indirectly
 
G

Guest

Guest
I'm going to patent wiping my butt with toilet paper. You ALL are in trouble!
 

Vladislaus

Distinguished
Jul 29, 2010
582
0
18,930
[citation][nom]watcha[/nom]Yep, Nokia & Sony-Ericsson are clearly responsible for starting the tablet phenomenon.[/citation]
[citation][nom]watcha[/nom]Yep, Nokia & Sony_Ericsson are clearly responsible for starting the smartphone and app-store phenomenon.Nokia certainly is one of them. [/citation]
Nokia certainly is one of the responsibles, or have you forgotten the tons of smartphones they introduced before the iPhone using Symbian? And they were successful, because at one time they had the largest marketshare on smartphones, and even today Apple never achieved a market share that big. Have you also forgotten the application stores that had quite a large portfolio of software available for symbian?
 

gus1991

Distinguished
Oct 5, 2011
13
0
18,560
[citation][nom]STravis[/nom]Yup - poor Apple, no future....stock price > $400, $80B in cash and people gobbling up their products..what can they do to survive???[/citation]

Oh My God... You are such a tool. You and Wolfgang Gruener should get together and have tea while playing with each others iPenises. Congratulations, you can keep gobbling up their products and nuts, your $400 stock, $80B company but remember this.. What goes up, must come down. Apple is extremely over rated, open your eyes and witness it yourself iSheep.
 
G

Guest

Guest
This funny to read all the comments of people that think Apple is "at fault" here. Apple brought the technology to the world in January 2007, the device wasn't launched until June 2007. If it wasn't Apple, then who? NOBODY had a multi-touch interface until the iPhone! Android copied iOS, and this is a FACT! Google has already admitted it, and Eric Schmidt was on Apple's Board of Directors when iPhone was launched. Then Google launched Android, and Schmidt was ousted from Apple's Board because of conflict of interest. Again, FACT! Apple innovates, everyone else copies. If i'm wrong, prove it. The Mac was based on Xerox, yes, but Xerox only had it as a prototype, not a released product. Enter Mac in January 1984, GUI was introduced to the World. Windows later. Does anyone here remember Command Prompt before GUI?
 

bustapr

Distinguished
Jan 23, 2009
550
0
18,930
aside from the fact of patenting a darn gesture, this tech/method to unlock phones has been around ever since before the iphone. Palm did it way before, and I have no doubt other companies also used this method to unlock tablets. How can they patent methods they didnt invent? The patent system is supposed to run an investigation on every patent filed, how can they approve this when Apple clearly didnt invent it?
 

STravis

Distinguished
Nov 3, 2009
238
0
18,830
[citation][nom]jacekring[/nom]I don't think you know how to read, as Apple filed this patent OVER a year after the first iPhone was release...read the article dumb ass.[/citation]

You might be right or wrong.... I have yet to see the filing papers or any link to the patent #...and based on what the level of reporting and differences between the various sites, I wouldn't be too quick to jump on someone's throat on this..
 

STravis

Distinguished
Nov 3, 2009
238
0
18,830
[citation][nom]gus1991[/nom]Oh My God... You are such a tool. You and Wolfgang Gruener should get together and have tea while playing with each others iPenises. Congratulations, you can keep gobbling up their products and nuts, your $400 stock, $80B company but remember this.. What goes up, must come down. Apple is extremely over rated, open your eyes and witness it yourself iSheep.[/citation]

It's only overrated to haters...investors (who can read financial reports) know that there is a lot more upside to Apple..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.