Qualcomm Does 2.5 GHz Quad-Core SoC in 2012

[ivyanev]

I've been listening for two years how ARM will bring cheap computing to the table.What i seen is expensive tablets (priced the same as standard i3 laptop).ARM will always be two steps back of entry level x86.

 

[nebun]

[citation][nom]eddieroolz[/nom]Frankly I'd wish Android would be more optimized instead, but we know that isn't happening.[/citation]
google is lazy...i need the option to add and remove any app that i wish, including googles crappy mobile software

 

[Guest]

[citation][nom]nebun[/nom]google is lazy...i need the option to add and remove any app that i wish, including googles crappy mobile software[/citation]

android isnt that bad i mean the droid bionic is super fast hard to imagine what twice the cores and twice+ the speed would produce how far along is battery tech i mean current tech with power like that last half a day or something just idle and then throw in bluetooth and wifi idle and so on and its not very pretty picture phones might need to be twice as thick for all the battery goodness they might demand

 

[archange]

[citation][nom]JeanLuc[/nom...
and AMD doesn't even have an ultra mobile strategy.
...[/citation]

I think you might be slightly behind times. About 1 - 2 years if I had to guess.
Brazos and Sabine (Fusion) do pretty well for netbooks / tablets / entry notebooks. I'd choose one over Atom any time (in fact I did).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_chipsets#Fusion_Controller_Hub_.28FCH.29

 

[nao1120]

Atom Sucks in comparison.... Its as slow as a Pentium 3 when Quake 3 was out... LOL..
http://laptoping.com/intel-atom-benchmark.html

They have a long way to go. Should be a lot snappier.

Well its smaller i guess?