Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs. Leading Phablets

Status
Not open for further replies.
"the Note 4 lasted 8 hours and 43 minutes. That’s 21 minutes longer than the smartphone category average but way behind the iPhone 6 Plus's time of 10 hours"

Since when does 9:16 round up to 10 hours? Common core perhaps? 33 minutes isn't really "way behind", it's only about 6% more.
 
Since when does 9:16 round up to 10 hours? Common core perhaps?

As a person who was previously an educator, the common core dig did make me chuckle. Thank goodness I don't have to contend with that craptacular, overly complicated method of teaching simple mathematics.

Well played, Claec. You get my thumb.
 
Was the battery life of the Note 4 tested with the latest firmware that was just released from Samsung? This firmware update promises great battery improvements.
 
Don't forget the LG G3 is $200 cheaper than the Note 4, which I think is worth noting. I have had it for 2 weeks and it has been great, super fast and 2 full days of use on the battery.
 
Was the battery life of the Note 4 tested with the latest firmware that was just released from Samsung? This firmware update promises great battery improvements.
 
Am I the only one who thinks it's silly that the average takes the Note 4 into account? We should be comparing the Note 4 to the current average... adding the Note 4 to the calculation moves the average and blurs the punchline.
 
Check out Engadget's Review. It says that when you put the phone on auto-brightness, it can go up to 750 Nits. Should that be put on the chart?

http://www.engadget.com/2014/10/15/samsung-galaxy-note-4-review/
 
Battery tests should be done at the default settings - they're turning down all the displays to 150nits; what if they left them all at default? Show me some real world results.
 


I don't even see the point in comparing the two seeing as the i6+ is barely up to snuff with the Note 2 from 2012.

Innovation, eh? Not since Jobs kicked it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.