Samsung's Galaxy S III Examined in Hands-on Video

[zblade]

As stated, this is the Galaxy M, it is not the S3. The Galaxy M was released this month (May) and in limited countries.

http/www.androidguys.com/2012/03/28/dual-core-samsung-gt-i9300-galaxy-m-expected-in-may/

 

[zblade]

Also forgot to mention that Amazon in Germany is already taking pre-orders. On the Amazon website it states a 12mp camera and I would go with what Amazon says more than some random guy with a Samsung Galaxy phone with black tape over and the phone in the video is not responsive or fast.

http/www.amazon.de/gp/product/B007VCRRNS/?tag=vig02-21

 

[nebun]

[citation][nom]Kami3k[/nom]So a quad core 1.4 ghz is lame for a SMARTPHONE?!LOL.[/citation]
yes it is...they need to optimize the OS before they up the hardware

 

[zulutech]

[citation][nom]soldier37[/nom]Not as impressive as I thought, Basically a slightly scaled down version of my Galaxy Note. Wish it came with the first reported 1920 x 1080 res I heard months ago. Nor the reported 12mp camera either or quad core cpu ??[/citation]
It is quad core.

 

[bboysil]

This is not a galaxy S3... look at the bezel on that monstrosity. The new S3 is slightly thinner and a tad longer then S2 but the bezel very small on the sides! check it out on gsmarena.com

PS. About the quad core CPU... I would have loved more a faster dual core then a quad core CPU simply because in 99% of the cases there is no use for that on a smartphone right now.. and surely next year it will be the same

 

[rohantheneo]

It would have been really nice if there would have been a Dual Core 1.5 GHz Krait CPU! It gives a little bit greater CPU performance than Cortex-A9 Quad at 1.4 GHz at much less power due to its 28nm architecture! Sad....
Also on Gsmarena it is said that it has same Mali-400 GPU as Galaxy S2. I just hope its not like that (at 720p resolution something similar to Adreno 225 must be there, lets hope its the next version of Mali)!!

 

[amdfreak]

My next phone

 

[Uberragen21]

[citation][nom]salgado18[/nom]Why do these phones keep getting bigger and bigger?[/citation]
I have to agree. My Samsung Charge has a 4.3" screen, and I thought it was huge when I bought it. I don't want one larger; this doesn't fit in my pocket very well as it is, and I have big pockets! Bigger is not always better; idiots in Texas have already proven that.

 

[Guest]

You could allso just try out youtube and search for Galaxy S III.....

i bet you'll find alot of fake videos there to ^^ In random Ytube videos i dont trust
Not to be a bastard.... but how stupid are you LoL 😛

Lets see something from SAMSUNG ... not something from a guy from Vietnam LOL

 

[eddieroolz]

Beauty...what beauty. It's just the regular plastic Galaxy.

 

[happyballz]

[citation][nom]Vladislaus[/nom]The GPU is a bit of a disappointment. It comes with the exact same GPU as in the Galaxy S II. I was hoping for a Mali-T604.[/citation]

http/www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_pops_up_briefly_in_glbenchmark_website-news-4137.php

Supposedly more cores than the old one. 3-4 now instead of 2.

 

[happyballz]

All of you who complain about big size must be dwarfs with little hands and small dwarf pants or those emo-skinny jeans 😉
My relax fit levi's fit my friends' dell streak with my hand inside just fine. You got to remember that longer/wider phone can fit bigger/slimmer battery. No one is pressuring you guys to buy these, all companies have plenty of smaller screen mid-market phones that are plenty fast too.