Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (More info?)
foolinyu wrote:
>>> CRTs are natural blury.
>>
>> What a BS. The Sony FW900 on my desk for sure isn't blurry...
>>
>> Benjamin
>
> I thought it was BS too until I look at a good LCD at very high
> resolution. The fonts were very small but it was like laser edged
> much sharper than my old LCDs. I compare this with my 21" CRT that I
> once used for graphics.
I have an SGI 1600SW 17.3" Widescreen TFT that still for sure is one of the
best TFT displays ever. It is crisp and sharp, but that doesn't make the
picture of the Sony FW900 blurry.
At work we have lots of TFTs and CRTs, and both are very good.
TFT is a different technology and provides a very sharp picture on its
native (and only on its native!) resolution. CRTs are of course not as sharp
and crisp as a good TFT, but it provides a very high quality on multiple
resolutions.
So yes, saying that CRTs are naturally blurry is complete BS. But from Mr
Moesl one can't expect much different...
Benjamin
foolinyu wrote:
>>> CRTs are natural blury.
>>
>> What a BS. The Sony FW900 on my desk for sure isn't blurry...
>>
>> Benjamin
>
> I thought it was BS too until I look at a good LCD at very high
> resolution. The fonts were very small but it was like laser edged
> much sharper than my old LCDs. I compare this with my 21" CRT that I
> once used for graphics.
I have an SGI 1600SW 17.3" Widescreen TFT that still for sure is one of the
best TFT displays ever. It is crisp and sharp, but that doesn't make the
picture of the Sony FW900 blurry.
At work we have lots of TFTs and CRTs, and both are very good.
TFT is a different technology and provides a very sharp picture on its
native (and only on its native!) resolution. CRTs are of course not as sharp
and crisp as a good TFT, but it provides a very high quality on multiple
resolutions.
So yes, saying that CRTs are naturally blurry is complete BS. But from Mr
Moesl one can't expect much different...
Benjamin
Facebook
Twitter