elbert
Distinguished
I would have to say radiation is bad. Many long term studys suggest that the FCC's 3 year study is a joke. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long. I for one will not use a cell phone and suggest for those who do to use the speaker phone.
Here is a few articles of interest with long term study's.
http://www.ehso.com/ehsoext.php?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/mobile-phones-more-dangerous-than-smoking-802602.html
Other country's require cancer warnings.
http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/cell-phone-cancer-warning-proposed-by-maine/139668
Possible the hardest hitting long term study.
http://www.naturalnews.com/027448_cell_phone_health_phones.html
http://www.radiationresearch.org/pdfs/15reasons.asp
http://www.thebigpitcher.org/2009/11/24/new-cellphone-study-environmental-working-group/
http://www.rense.com/general61/sdew.htm
Here is a few articles of interest with long term study's.
http://www.ehso.com/ehsoext.php?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/mobile-phones-more-dangerous-than-smoking-802602.html
Other country's require cancer warnings.
http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/cell-phone-cancer-warning-proposed-by-maine/139668
Possible the hardest hitting long term study.
http://www.naturalnews.com/027448_cell_phone_health_phones.html
http://www.radiationresearch.org/pdfs/15reasons.asp
http://www.thebigpitcher.org/2009/11/24/new-cellphone-study-environmental-working-group/
http://www.rense.com/general61/sdew.htm