[citation][nom]irtehyar[/nom]Meh. Apple is already telling me what I need and don't need (flash?), and what I like. They might as well know where I'm doing it. That way they can make products that only work in specific locations, because it's better there.[/citation]
I don't consume Apples and I'll tell ya Flash is bad. I won't say why or hint that I know exactly, but just simply say its bad for you and a security risk.
I'm wrapped up in symbolism enough that I personally would never "purchase" or "use freely" any Apple device, even at a loss of abilities.
To generalize like that is definitely dumb but overall if I'm happier opting out then it becomes less dumb. Alternatively, if opting in makes you happier, by all means, go for it. Afterall, trading one greedy corp for another nets similar results anyhow.
I prefer a dumb phone because I have no use for any type of smartphone. That's where I start looking at people oddly that choose to have smartphones who clearly do not need most of its abilities that make it smart in the first place. People buy iphones because they like to swipe their pictures with their finger, for example. That's a lot of extra expense for a feature.
Anyway, if the data is unencrypted, which it is stated as being, then Apple dropped the ball really hard even if its only a perceived threat that is never realized or actually happens. In this day and age, any company should know full well the expectations of its consumers as well as or better than its 3rd party affiliates.