G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
On 2005-07-19, aloe@rev.net <aloe@rev.net> wrote:
>
>
> Ken Alverson wrote:
>> <aloe@rev.net> wrote in message
>> news:1121722573.451972.263820@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>> If you have DirectTV, consider a DirectTV based Tivo.
>
> No thanks. I'm not interested in paying $500 annually just to record
> TV. (I've been using my VCR for years at a fraction of the cost.)
>
> I'll inquire about the standalones.
A standalone monthly fee is more than a DTiVo monthly fee.
And $500 annually is $41.66/month. Why would you pay $41.66/month for
TiVo service? Unless this was a knock against DirecTV...but that's why
Ken wrote "If you have DirecTV..." If you already are paying for DirecTV,
a DTiVo is a no-brainer. If you don't have DirecTV, it might not be the
best solution.
--
This is my .sig
On 2005-07-19, aloe@rev.net <aloe@rev.net> wrote:
>
>
> Ken Alverson wrote:
>> <aloe@rev.net> wrote in message
>> news:1121722573.451972.263820@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>> If you have DirectTV, consider a DirectTV based Tivo.
>
> No thanks. I'm not interested in paying $500 annually just to record
> TV. (I've been using my VCR for years at a fraction of the cost.)
>
> I'll inquire about the standalones.
A standalone monthly fee is more than a DTiVo monthly fee.
And $500 annually is $41.66/month. Why would you pay $41.66/month for
TiVo service? Unless this was a knock against DirecTV...but that's why
Ken wrote "If you have DirecTV..." If you already are paying for DirecTV,
a DTiVo is a no-brainer. If you don't have DirecTV, it might not be the
best solution.
--
This is my .sig