Idk, if you can go and buy a pool for 200-300 dollars and take it down and put it up every year or so, i dont know what the issue would be. If you are building a above ground or underground pool, i believe in the process of doing so pays for and gains a permit, cause if someone is building it for you, they should of have some licenses and if you are building it yourself then whatever expense involved should cover a permit.
Cause the permit helps provide funds i believe to ensure systems and such work accordingly with the extra water usage and build up, which shouldnt be a complaint. Think the complaint comes in in over compensation on means to pay for things else where, which is justifiable given the action of being able to use Google Earth in the first place. Just on some means of the permits and taxing doesnt justify the means in which say a pool was obtained. Maybe, im not really for sure, given each city and twon has varied laws around such things. But some of the points provided are founded. To what extent i dont know. Having toget a permit of most cases in about dumb though too. But in others its not. And what Google Earth is going to help inforce? Idk. If buying a 200-300 dollar pool setup thats tkes twice as much work to maintain and twice as much expenses to run over an inground or above groun built pool, i'd have no clue why i would have to get a permit either. Might dig a hole and put a "cheaper" pool in it. What would that present?