Verizon's 3G "Map For That" Campaign Continues

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The iPhone appeals to people who just want a product that works. I have had many WM phones that were ok to play with but worthless if you want to get something done or use it as a phone. Apple's main feature is that it works reliably and quickly. Quality will always get my money no matter who makes it.
 
The iPhone appeals to people who just want a product that works. I have had many WM phones that were ok to play with but worthless if you want to get something done or use it as a phone. Apple's main feature is that it works reliably and quickly. Quality will always get my money no matter who makes it.
 
As for service AT&T has always been the best in my area, NW Missouri. Verizon even pulled their store out of our town of 100,000 because they said their service wasn't that good and there wasn't enough demand.
 
[citation][nom]kdw75[/nom]As for service AT&T has always been the best in my area, NW Missouri. Verizon even pulled their store out of our town of 100,000 because they said their service wasn't that good and there wasn't enough demand.[/citation]

At least Verizon admits there service is bad in your area and pulled out. In NYC, a place you'd expect AT&T to you know, work, a rep told me that 30% dropped call rate and a dl rate of 26kbps was normal for my area ...
right...and don't gimme that there's a limitation to wireless bandwith BS. Hong Kong and all of Japan manage to give ~1.2mbps dl rate, a
 
Tom's cut em off >.< want to buy edit button!

Anyway, Hong Kong and Japan have more users, a higher concentration of ppl, and ppl who use their phones more often and still manage almost 0 dropped calls and a ~1.2mbps dl rate.

If the damn Chinese can do it, no excuse AT&T can't.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.