kyuuketsuki
Distinguished
If you look at the relative number of people dying from violence now versus any time period in history, the result is: way, way less people die from violence now. Obviously, there are exceptions depending on the locale, but this is almost unilaterally true outside of war zones.
Since videogames have only existed for a couple decades, the movie industry for a century or so, and the ability to record music for widespread distribution for about the same period, the only possible conclusion is that media, whether videogame, music, or movie, is not responsible for human violence. Focusing on it is just inane.
People killed each other just fine (and far more often) before modern firearms as well. Banning firearms is not going to solve anything. Not that I'm against reasonable restrictions, mind you.
Although maybe we should ban music, videogames, movies, and guns for a while. Just so that when violence doesn't go away we can see what other ridiculous scapegoats people come up with.
Since videogames have only existed for a couple decades, the movie industry for a century or so, and the ability to record music for widespread distribution for about the same period, the only possible conclusion is that media, whether videogame, music, or movie, is not responsible for human violence. Focusing on it is just inane.
People killed each other just fine (and far more often) before modern firearms as well. Banning firearms is not going to solve anything. Not that I'm against reasonable restrictions, mind you.
Although maybe we should ban music, videogames, movies, and guns for a while. Just so that when violence doesn't go away we can see what other ridiculous scapegoats people come up with.