[citation][nom]SpartanStang14[/nom]It would also be easy to call you an idiot because you make assumptions about what other people say in order to support your own arguments. I never said that the way the phone looks is the only similarity. If the incremental hardware updates and voice commands (which Android has had since Froyo) are enough to convince you to spend $300-400 on a new(ish) model (and that's if you have a phone upgrade available), then be my guest. Apple didn't even develop Siri, they bought it and took it off the App Store to make it an exclusive feature for the 4S while integrating it into the OS. If anyone here is naive, it's the one willing to throw away money on a phone that they're going to have essentially the same experience with.[/citation]
AHHH, you threw the gloves down (or your pocket protector) with the idiot statement.
Do me a favor, borrow your friends IPhone 4 and hold down the button on the bottom. What comes up........Voice Control. Has been their since the 3GS and is comparable to what you have on your beloved Android device. Get over yourself. Siri is not the same as what you have already and you know it, which is why you are trolling so much about the 4s. Do you honestly think that Google developed everything in Android without licensing or borrowing other tech in their OS or are you still in the dark as to why Microsoft is making more money on Android than Google is?
I don't have to make assumptions about what other people say, you guys say plenty with the fact's in many cases being completely absent.
So tell me, do you believe an acquisition and integration of the acquired tech into a companies existing products does not count as a differentiator by virtue that the company did not develop it from scratch? Since when is their a requirement that everything has to be developed in house to be a compelling solution?
Take game development for example, does the fact that a great game that licenses the network code and the underline graphics engine make the game less great somehow. How about the fact that NVidia acquired and integrated Physx and then marketed it as a differentiator against their competitors. This is how products get better. Apple does it, Microsoft does, Google does it, Samsung does it. Everyone does so you so if that is your argument...well since you are calling me an idiot I think it is safe to say that it is clear who the idiot really is.
If another company has a sweet tech and it would be cheaper to buy the company and integrate the tech rather than develop it from scratch would you not make that business decision if it gave you competitive advantages?
Wake up dude, seriously.
AHHH, you threw the gloves down (or your pocket protector) with the idiot statement.
Do me a favor, borrow your friends IPhone 4 and hold down the button on the bottom. What comes up........Voice Control. Has been their since the 3GS and is comparable to what you have on your beloved Android device. Get over yourself. Siri is not the same as what you have already and you know it, which is why you are trolling so much about the 4s. Do you honestly think that Google developed everything in Android without licensing or borrowing other tech in their OS or are you still in the dark as to why Microsoft is making more money on Android than Google is?
I don't have to make assumptions about what other people say, you guys say plenty with the fact's in many cases being completely absent.
So tell me, do you believe an acquisition and integration of the acquired tech into a companies existing products does not count as a differentiator by virtue that the company did not develop it from scratch? Since when is their a requirement that everything has to be developed in house to be a compelling solution?
Take game development for example, does the fact that a great game that licenses the network code and the underline graphics engine make the game less great somehow. How about the fact that NVidia acquired and integrated Physx and then marketed it as a differentiator against their competitors. This is how products get better. Apple does it, Microsoft does, Google does it, Samsung does it. Everyone does so you so if that is your argument...well since you are calling me an idiot I think it is safe to say that it is clear who the idiot really is.
If another company has a sweet tech and it would be cheaper to buy the company and integrate the tech rather than develop it from scratch would you not make that business decision if it gave you competitive advantages?
Wake up dude, seriously.
Facebook
Twitter