Since the sale, the quality of this site has declined, and it seems like 20-somethings from Wired are taking over, from bad reviews to posts like this. If it keeps going, it'll be like Napster and AOL, empty branding.
That being said:
"But it is somewhat ridiculous on Microsoft’s part to act as though they have stumbled upon some miracle. Why would someone want to pay for a service that has been readily available for use? It’s a prime example of a corporation merely taking advantage of the public with an attempt to charge for something that should be available to customers for free."
This is the kind of stuff people don't like reading. Microsoft didnt "act" in any way, they just added a zero-effort feature for subscribers. People want factual, accurate news reports, not fan-boy commentary about the "evil bloodsucking corporations". Leave that on the forums, you aren't as hip, trendy and rebellious as you wish you were.
This planet is full of things that are free to do, yet can also be purchased, because convenience has intrinsic value. Condoms are free from some places, paid for in others. It's not about if it *can* be done, its about a persons willingness to do it themselves, irrespective of how difficult it really is.
Microsoft always knew you could stream Netflix, but there are licensing issues and branding issues that go above people wannabe 1337 hacker skills for a company sponsored roll out. Maybe this was Netflix's stipulation for official support, ever consider that?
There was a demand for a turnkey solution involving Netflix, and Microsoft did something they didn't have to and delivered. They aren't going out of their way to force people to do it their way, or disabling peoples hacks. People aren't flocking to X-Box Live because of this. They are giving less technical people more value for their subscriptions, and that's it.
So please just stick to reporting the news and spare us your "take" on the situation.