G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.replaytv (More info?)
John in Detroit wrote:
> Zardoz... I'm kind of tired of you coming here and dis-ing the RTV units
> over and over and over again...
>
> Long before I went shopping I put the feature and ability charts for
> both RTV and Tivo up next to each other... And to be honest it's been a
> while so I don't recall exactly what features (other than IVS, and I
> think I may have an IVS work-around for machines that don't have it)
> affected my decision.
>
> But Replay won, hands down
>
> So..... I'm very happy with my Replays... Even my wife is happy. I do
> not think I'd be nearly as happy with Tivo
>
> Zardoz wrote:
>
>>> While forgetting that the majority of people are of low intelligence
>>> and mental flexibility (or at least have learned to act that way), and
>>> mindlessly follow others.
>>
>>
>>
>> Like those people who say how great RTV is because of streaming video
>> and DVArchive while neglecting the fact that every single other aspect
>> of the machine is inferior to it's biggest competitor's features?
>>
>>
>
John in Detroit wrote:
> Zardoz... I'm kind of tired of you coming here and dis-ing the RTV units
> over and over and over again...
>
> Long before I went shopping I put the feature and ability charts for
> both RTV and Tivo up next to each other... And to be honest it's been a
> while so I don't recall exactly what features (other than IVS, and I
> think I may have an IVS work-around for machines that don't have it)
> affected my decision.
>
> But Replay won, hands down
>
> So..... I'm very happy with my Replays... Even my wife is happy. I do
> not think I'd be nearly as happy with Tivo
>
> Zardoz wrote:
>
>>> While forgetting that the majority of people are of low intelligence
>>> and mental flexibility (or at least have learned to act that way), and
>>> mindlessly follow others.
>>
>>
>>
>> Like those people who say how great RTV is because of streaming video
>> and DVArchive while neglecting the fact that every single other aspect
>> of the machine is inferior to it's biggest competitor's features?
>>
>>
>