[citation][nom]dconnors[/nom]Andy gives plenty of information to make up your own mind, so why can't he express his own opinion while doing so? Do you really think Tom's Guide readers can't separate Andy's opinion on the Metro UI from the non-biased information that goes along with it?While Andy makes it clear that he doesn't like Metro, the biggest issue is not being able to choose a boot screen. Booting into Metro on a tablet or some other touchscreen device is perfectly fine (and I think Andy would agree with me on that), but if I'm running Windows 8 on a gaming machine that has no use for Metro, I don't want to have to boot into that UI and then switch over every single time I turn my machine on. Choice is the operative word here.-Devin Connors, Tom's Guide[/citation]
Which reinforces my belief that Microsoft are missing implementing a basic and good principle - separate the interface from the underlying OS core, and keep different interfaces physically separate (like Linux does today, and Win 3.1 did with DOS in the old days).
If they got that into their blood, then they could have as many different interfaces as they need for the device types that Windows would be aimed at, each optimized for the specific device Windows would be on. It would also be far easier to maintain as a tweak/bug fix/change needed for one device type wouldn't risk being a problem on other device types.