Unimpressed, guys, with the immature downranking and such. IE10 has breakages; it is not as standards-compliant as webkit or even the falling star gecko. Furthermore, why should Google bother? I never saw Nokia guys complaining TO GOOGLE about the lack of apps, but rather to Nokia, back when it was Symbian and MeeGo.
And honestly, who are Windows Phone users to complain? Those users *bought* into an ecosystem that overall hasn't pushed the units to warrant the apps, and defaults to a browser with both flaws and a horrendous reputation. I bought an Android partially for the Google applications. I might also buy an iPhone for them. Simultaneously, I use Linux Mint and Bodhi Linux part-time, and I don't yell and scream for Apple to port Safari or Microsoft to port Word. Why? I can put up with LibreOffice. It's called tolerance. If Windows Phone is really made of loyal users, they'll just start a wave to a new standard spot for videos (won't happen soon in my opinion). Microsoft now supports ODT by demand, and it wasn't because they love Oracle or FOSS.
To Windows Phone users:
Besides, HTML5 video is still *beta.* Particularly on desktop. And what are you doing on desktop, anyway? I never go to Youtube on desktop on my Android, nor can I from Google's own browser! They yell at me that Chrome is out of date! My only option is the stock browser in desktop mode WITH FLASH. Get MS to bring that in and then you can start (irrationally still; you're on a phone) complaining about the desktop site.
To the guy who brought up Chrome OS:
Relevance? Google put together Chrome OS to hype up its platforms, not to try and beat Microsoft (short-term) in that space.