G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)
wigglingstring@gmail.com wrote:
> Verizon's service in Chicago is actually very good. However, I'm now
> toying with the idea of Cingular. Looking at the phone collection, I'm
> intrigued by the Nokia 6230 which appears to do all I want it do with
> the exception of having GSM 900 (triband not quad band).
>
> Is GSM 900 critical in Europe/Asia? Do I really need a quad band phone
> like the Motorola V551 or the RAZR? Which phone would you recommend for
> occasional world roaming, bluetooth, a camera, Edge is not really a
> requirement but would be nice. Thanks for any help.
>
> Wiggling
If it's only the occasional trip, either 900 or 1800 should suffice.
Not as good as both, but much better than neither.
TH
wigglingstring@gmail.com wrote:
> Verizon's service in Chicago is actually very good. However, I'm now
> toying with the idea of Cingular. Looking at the phone collection, I'm
> intrigued by the Nokia 6230 which appears to do all I want it do with
> the exception of having GSM 900 (triband not quad band).
>
> Is GSM 900 critical in Europe/Asia? Do I really need a quad band phone
> like the Motorola V551 or the RAZR? Which phone would you recommend for
> occasional world roaming, bluetooth, a camera, Edge is not really a
> requirement but would be nice. Thanks for any help.
>
> Wiggling
If it's only the occasional trip, either 900 or 1800 should suffice.
Not as good as both, but much better than neither.
TH