1920 x 1080p DLP chip.

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

In article <AQH6e.66824$cg1.57924@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, numeric
says...
>
>Texas Instruments has announced their 1920 x 1080p DLP chip.
>see http://www.dlp.com/about_dlp/about_dlp_press_release.asp?id=1234
>

Sounds like this chip may solve the drawbacks in DLP. Great, so when I'm ready
to upgrade in 3 or 4 years I should be able to find a 72" set that I can afford.
 

Richard

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
370
0
18,930
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

"BillJ" <BillJ_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:d3gg4o021js@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <AQH6e.66824$cg1.57924@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> numeric
> says...
>>
>>Texas Instruments has announced their 1920 x 1080p DLP chip.
>>see http://www.dlp.com/about_dlp/about_dlp_press_release.asp?id=1234
>>
>
> Sounds like this chip may solve the drawbacks in DLP. Great, so when I'm
> ready
> to upgrade in 3 or 4 years I should be able to find a 72" set that I can
> afford.

On a web post from the maker of an alternative 1080p chip technology it was
stated that the TI approach merely simulated 1080p resolutions. I don't know
if this is true or if it matters; but there you have it.

Richard.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

Richard wrote:
> "BillJ" <BillJ_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> news:d3gg4o021js@drn.newsguy.com...
>
>>In article <AQH6e.66824$cg1.57924@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
>>numeric
>>says...
>>
>>>Texas Instruments has announced their 1920 x 1080p DLP chip.
>>>see http://www.dlp.com/about_dlp/about_dlp_press_release.asp?id=1234
>>>
>>
>>Sounds like this chip may solve the drawbacks in DLP. Great, so when I'm
>>ready
>>to upgrade in 3 or 4 years I should be able to find a 72" set that I can
>>afford.
>
>
> On a web post from the maker of an alternative 1080p chip technology it was
> stated that the TI approach merely simulated 1080p resolutions. I don't know
> if this is true or if it matters; but there you have it.
>
> Richard.
>


I have heard a similar story; but according to the press release it may
be the full 1920 x 1080 resolution.
"At the heart of every DLP chip is an array of up to 2 million
microscopic mirrors which switch incredibly fast to create a high
resolution, highly reliable, full color image."

Since 1920 X 1080 = 2,073,600 (2 million) pixels it would seem that the
new chip does support the full resolution, without the need to resort to
simulated techniques. Regardless if there are actually 2 million pixels
or a smaller array used in a clever way to simulate 2 million pixels,
the net result must be the full 1920 x 1080p resolution for the press
announcement to be truthful.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

numeric wrote:
> I have heard a similar story; but according to the press release it may
> be the full 1920 x 1080 resolution.
> "At the heart of every DLP chip is an array of up to 2 million
> microscopic mirrors which switch incredibly fast to create a high
> resolution, highly reliable, full color image."
>
> Since 1920 X 1080 = 2,073,600 (2 million) pixels it would seem that the
> new chip does support the full resolution, without the need to resort to
> simulated techniques. Regardless if there are actually 2 million pixels
> or a smaller array used in a clever way to simulate 2 million pixels,
> the net result must be the full 1920 x 1080p resolution for the press
> announcement to be truthful.

I have not kept up on the details, but the last I read, the 1920x1080
DLP chips were going to be 960x1080 actual mirrors. They use 1 mirror to
generate 2 pixels by flipping the mirror at a high speed between two
different angles to control 2 pixels on the screen. TI does this with
their lower cost 720p chipset which is 640x720 mirrors; the more
expensive HD2+ is 1280x720 mirrors which are generally regarded as
providing the better picture. Check the RPTV forum on www.avsforum.com,
should be more detailed info there.

Alan F